romeen
DSM Wiseman
- 2,531
- 37
- Jul 12, 2006
-
Vancouver,
Washington
I'm not sure if this would provide any benefit given the design/shape of our combustion chambers. Has anyone tried it? If so, what difference if any did you notice?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=7280401 said:A method was devised which uses ion probe detection of flames burning through a gap inside the combustion chamber to provide rapid and convenient measurement of two-surface flame-quench distances in an operating engine.^This method was used to establish that such quench distances range from about 0.01 cm to greater than 0.2 cm, depending in decreasing order on equivalence ratio, manifold pressure, wall temperature, spark timing, and fuel type.^A comparison between these experimental findings and the results from one- and two-surface measurements performed by others indicates that two surface quench values are 2.5 to 12 times greater than one-surface values
We're of different schools. I'd bet if you didn't know your iridiums had been swapped-out, you'd never realize they were.
93 octane (we don't have 91 in Texas)
defiant said:That's just cheating, then.
And you are absolutely right about it being an obsessive "car guy" type behavior.
Featured Products from our Supporting Vendors