Defiant
DSM Wiseman
- 34,747
- 228
- Jan 13, 2003
-
glorious Galt,
California
Don't look at me. If you'll read the thread I supplied, you'll see I was all for the idea. I'm very uncomfotable with most FMIC setups: I don't like the air coming into the radiator being pre-heated as well as obstructed (as though the AC condensor doesn't do enough of that), and I sure don't like the five-feet (and more) of intake distance. I much prefer the idea of a jacketed exchanger right in the path of a short intake, then a radiator for its water in where the usual sidemount was. But in reality, it seems to turn into a mess. Resevoired systems don't enter into my consideration, because drag-racing doesn't.98TalonTSi said:I don't understand why people think going with an air to water intercooler is a nuisance, not proven, or worth it...
Well, no. You shouldn't try this at home. I am a professional.Defiant, I'm not trying to be a smart ass here,
I'm keen on how it works. It's how to get it to work that seems to be the challenge. Then, after complication, the cost enters into it.but logical. The water is cooled with the same idea of how a car's antifreeze is cooled, through a radiator, but much smaller.
But when all is said and done, it's still air-cooled. The water's just moving the heat from one radiator to another.And it is proven that water transfers heat better than air.
And there you're off the street, which again, isn't in my design criteria.A glycol mix can be used, be the HUGE gains and advantage over a conventional FMIC is the use of ice.
The thousands and thousands of cars out there with front-mounts don't have a problem with it, so I suppose I shouldn't either.
But I still do.

. But i also was trying to make it my daily driver.
. also if you use salt water it will take more to get it heated. Since its in such a small area still really wont be enough to last long. its a neat idea but i dont think it would be efficent