The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

H-beam and I-beam rods

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

For years the battle has raged on as to which is better, an I-beam or an H-beam. In pure tension and compression, they are both equally capable, assuming equal cross-sectional area. But when you add the fact that some components of the combustion event attempt to screw the piston down the cylinder, the greater distance from the centerline of the pin to the edge of the beam gives the H-beam an advantage in resisting such twisting forces. We've seen both designs used successfully in a wide variety of extreme applications, so the jury is still out. Perhaps the biggest advantage of the H-beam design is that it gives the manufacturer more flexibility when sculpting the rod into the most effective form from a strength-to-mass standpoint.

I-Beam on left. H-Beam on right.
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
Last edited by a moderator:
The strength of a rod in tension is mostly determined by it's cross sectional area, not the shape. All else being equal, heavier rods are stronger in tension. Resistance to bending force is more strongly influenced by shape. For equal weight, the H beam rod will handle more bending force. The V8 hot rodders have been using H beam rods for years as upgrades.

For much more about rod design see http://www.grapeaperacing.com/GrapeApeRacing/tech/connectingrods.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Keep in mind, a heavier rod equals more rotating mas. Low reving, high horse power engines would gain more from a heavier H-Beam rod. A lighter I-Beam rod would be more suitable for high reving engines.
 
Keep in mind, a heavier rod equals more rotating mas. Low reving, high horse power engines would gain more from a heavier H-Beam rod. A lighter I-Beam rod would be more suitable for high reving engines.

All true. I selected H beams for my stroker project because all of my design compromises were made in favor of low end torque. Your mileage may vary.

For more on how rod forces are affected in the 4G63 by stroking for more torque or destroking for higher RPM, please see page 36 of http://www.kidzuku.com/StrokeOrNot.pdf.
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

  • For sale Misc Left Over Parts
    Hello, I have a few left over parts for sale, these do not include shipping, please pm me for a...
    • r3dmak
    • Updated:
    • Expires
  • For sale Alpha Injection Clinic 2200cc for 4G63 DSM/EVO
    I have a set of Alpha Injection Clinic 2200cc high z injectors for DSM/EVO. I am stepping up to...
    • spoolinpos
    • Updated:
    • Expires
  • Wanted WTB 2g half rad
    ISO of a 2g koyo half rad or something equivalent.
    • Michael Wucher
    • Updated:
    • Expires
  • For sale Coilover Springs
    Used pair of Eibach coilover springs from an old set of Ground Control coilovers. 2.5" inner...
    • RamenPride
    • Updated:
    • Expires
  • For sale 4G63 Mitsubishi logo early valve cover
    Early Mitsubishi logo valvecover. “1990” All threaded holes are good. Has the 90 style vent...
    • Galant665
    • Updated:
Back
Top