98spydert
15+ Year Contributor
- 1,916
- 8
- Jan 16, 2004
-
Phoenix,
Arizona
anconover said:I believe he means he was wrong. You were right.
:laugh: yeah no use arguing if you're wrongFollow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
anconover said:I believe he means he was wrong. You were right.
:laugh: yeah no use arguing if you're wrongDiceman19 said:yea, thats cute children....
four dots above your rolleyes because i dont normally like to spend my time arguing on the internet.

boostaddictgsx said:the pros of a blowthru setup - venting B.O.V., more accurate signal, the boost leak precaution, the blown coupler precaution - DSMlink works with it, because the input appears to be from a STOCK 1G MAS, due to the fact that the MAF-T is set at zero.
DSMlink owns all other forms because it works DIRECTLY with the ECU, and doesn't mess with the signal. Given the choice, I would use a combo, because there isn't really a downside to doing it, it may cost a little more money, but it will make future mods very easy, and it allows you to simplify the look of your engine bay. DSMlink is on my list when I get a new car, whether or not to use the MAF-T, well, that's a different choice altogether