bonecollector
10+ Year Contributor
- 159
- 32
- Nov 9, 2011
-
Flagstaff,
Arizona
First question:
For those of you using either of those clutches, how has the clutch disk held up? I'm mostly concerned with the material quality of the metal parts / design more so than the friction surface.
Reason I'm asking is because in the past i've broken an ACT street disk around the spring area (pretty common) failure point. the clutch had a good amount of mileage put on it, so it was probably just it's time to go.
I've also broken a Competition Clutch stage 3 disk, I bent the shit out of the (bronze looking) metal plate that holds the friction pads almost immediately after break in.
Does anyone know if there is a difference in clamping force between the FX300 and the FX350? (this is probably going to be a question for CM sales rep.) but i figured i'd ask here anyways.
Second question:
For those of you using either of those clutches, how has the clutch disk held up? I'm mostly concerned with the material quality of the metal parts / design more so than the friction surface.
Reason I'm asking is because in the past i've broken an ACT street disk around the spring area (pretty common) failure point. the clutch had a good amount of mileage put on it, so it was probably just it's time to go.
I've also broken a Competition Clutch stage 3 disk, I bent the shit out of the (bronze looking) metal plate that holds the friction pads almost immediately after break in.
Any input would be helpful,
Thank you.
Thank you.