The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

ACT 2100 + 400hp?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Ya you would need at least a 2600 to hold 400 with a street disk maybe a 2100 with a sprung 6 puck would do the trick
 
Unfortunately, I had bought the 2100 before I knew where I wanted to go with the car but I ended up buying alot more parts and stuff then I intended too and now I guess I'm going to go with the 2600 w/ Street disk. Anyone here use or know anything about the act 2900 with street disk?
 
We're not saying it wouldn't do the job... we're saying it wouldn't do it's job very long...
 
The street disks on those ACT 2600 I've heard the like springs stick out more have been giving people trouble.

The springs i'm talking about look like coils, around the disk. I think last time I saw, they were 6.
 
The street disks on those ACT 2600 I've heard the like springs stick out more have been giving people trouble.

The springs i'm talking about look like coils, around the disk. I think last time I saw, they were 6.

The new disk used with the old pressure plate is the issue. They revised the pressure plate when they revised the disk.

Fidanza, naw. It's light weight, but it won't last long either.

Mine has lasted a long time. Why do you think they don't last long? I've never heard of anyone having problems with them lasting long.
 
Of course I saw all the clutch threads but none answered my question concerning the power that I hope to put down so how about you stfu and stop wasting space in my thread. Thank you ma'am.

Power....power....Every clutch thread deals with power. What else do you want a clutch to do, bake your cookies? Here this one deals with power at only 360. So if there recomending a 2600 for only 360 any normal brained person would say ohh the same for 400tq. http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/showthread.php?t=261358&highlight=act+2100

This one goes into deph on awd and so on
http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/showthread.php?t=223291&highlight=act+2100

that took a whole 3 min to find those. They go for the same range of Hp as you. I had a thread started on 400 awdhp clutches before. Ill find it later because its obvious your too imcompitant to find it on your own.

edit.... Post #10 and 11 answer your question flat out.
http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/showthread.php?t=256153&highlight=act+2600+400
 
Yes it will for the HP.. But not the torque

For 400 I'd step up to the 2900 instead of the 2600...

Well, a 400 WHP 2G is probably around 350 ft/lbs TQ, so why would you recommend such a large pressure plate? IIRC, the 2900 is rated at 600 ft/lbs of torque.

The 2600 plate and street disk will be just fine. Hell, a 2100 will even still hold up to that power - it did for me. The only problem with the 2100 would be that it's at it's peak capability. It would be a safer bet to get the 2600 and have a little room to play.

The Fidanza 4.3 clutch kit would be a good option as well.


I don't understand where this sudden wave of clutch misconceptions came from. Why does everyone feel the need to run a damn 2900 PP? 50% of the people running it probably doesn't need anything that big, and 80% of the people they are recommending them for, don't need it either.

If you're burning up street disk's, then try a different material disk. More pressure plate will cause your street disk to wear just as excessive and in many cases, it causes uneven wear and warping. You have to match your disk to your pressure plate, and the assembly has to match your torque output. You don't install a 2900 and 6-puck on your stock 2G, just because you figure you'll never need to upgrade it ever again - it doesn't work that way.


To the thread starter: The 2600 and street disk will be just just fine if you're at 340+ ft/lbs torque.
 
Last edited:
Well, a 400 WHP 2G is probably around 350 ft/lbs TQ, so why would you recommend such a large pressure plate? IIRC, the 2900 is rated at 600 ft/lbs of torque.

The 2600 plate and street disk will be just fine. Hell, a 2100 will even still hold up to that power - it did for me. The only problem with the 2100 would be that it's at it's peak capability. It would be a safer bet to get the 2600 and have a little room to play.

The Fidanza 4.3 clutch kit would be a good option as well.


I don't understand where this sudden wave of clutch misconceptions came from. Why the hell does everyone feel the need to run a damn 2900 PP? 50% of the people running it probably doesn't need anything that big, and 80% of the people they are recommending them for, don't need it either.

If you're burning up street disk's, then try a different material disk. More pressure plate will cause your street disk to wear just as excessive and in many cases, it causes uneven wear and warping. You have to match your disk to your pressure plate, and the assembly has to match your torque output. You don't install a 2900 and 6-puck on your stock 2G, just because you figure you'll never need to upgrade it ever again - it doesn't work that way.


To the thread starter: The 2600 and street disk will be just just fine if you're at 340+ ft/lbs torque.

Thanks for the input... Ordering the 2600 with street disk as I type LOL
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top