The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Which specific Pocketlogger?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

no, on the top one the software must be able to interface thru the ODB-II complaince shit. That why you get 10-15 samples a second, but it works on a list of cars. Where as the DSM version is just for 1G DSMS. you get about 45 sampmles per second. if you truely drive a 99 get the odb2 compliant version or save your money for DSMlink, I use to have the logger/SAFC/Translator, now I just use the 95 eprom and the link. Much better.
 
spoolup said:
no, on the top one the software must be able to interface thru the ODB-II complaince shit. That why you get 10-15 samples a second, but it works on a list of cars. Where as the DSM version is just for 1G DSMS. you get about 45 sampmles per second. if you truely drive a 99 get the odb2 compliant version or save your money for DSMlink, I use to have the logger/SAFC/Translator, now I just use the 95 eprom and the link. Much better.


Ok, I just emailed the people at DSMlink.

My question to them and now to you: Do I have to have the 1995 ECU for DSMlink to work or will my 1999 ECU do the job?

Thanks!
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top