juanpac0
10+ Year Contributor
- 1,036
- 7
- Oct 15, 2008
-
San Francisco,
California
HX-35 on a 2.0.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.


s362 t3 .70a/r w/2.3 stroker!!!!!
another month and it will not be a dream any longer

Borg s362, divided .85 t3.
You must be logged in to view this image or video.


+1
I will have mine in a few days. Cant beat a bad ass twin scroll setup.

Just because one guy with an unlimited budget and a car shop did it.. don't take it for fact. Think of it as a high 9/ low 10s turbo.
Im just bringing out the fact that its capable of 8s in a full weight street car. Who cares if its a shop car or not. Why the hell would I think of it as a high 9/ low 10 second turbo? Having that kinda mentality wont get you very far.

I'd like to see where this turbo is propelling full wight street cars to 8's?
Edit: I see AWD Motorsports did it eh? Is that really a full weight street car?
Edit #2: Is the 6262 a 62mm inducer? I don't know much about them.
.I'm not picky toward brand or type, but whatever I run in the future will not be a journal-bearing Garrett.

^^^ Needs AWD!!
The engine bay shots show how large the turbine housing is. A smaller turbine housing has done more than what an 8blade compressor can deliver. I really am not interested in a 700whp turbo. 1) High slip (more blades) and low trim for a very efficient compressor, 2) big turbine housing twinscroll (forces the gases to do more work on the turbine and less on the intake charge & the bigger housing makes for lower back pressure while doing it) and low turbine wheel trim (extracts more work from the exhaust gases) for a very efficient turbine; great pumpgas power AND great spool.No need for me to link you....it's easier for me to explain.Could you PM me the link to that thread so I can read as to why you dislike JB Garrett center sections?
No need for me to link you....it's easier for me to explain.
I honestly believe Garrett is suffering right now among DSMers due to old technology. Half the popular Garrett compressor wheels can outflow what a DSM bolt-on turbine housing will allow with the turbine wheels they're using, and the turbos themselves just aren't durable. If you restrict the oil flow enough to get them to stop smoking, they blow from too little oil in the journals.
I never understood this fully until last summer with my buddy's new PTE 6031E. Now toward the end of it's lifespan he was absolutely wringing this turbo for all it was worth at 30-35psi, but it didn't hold up even at 20-25psi.
He started out by running the turbo unrestricted from the filter housing. It started smoking and sounding like a circular saw literally on the way home from it's first trip to the track with the turbo installed on a newly rebuilt engine. I pull the turbo down- there was wear on the journal bearings but no wheel damage or shaft scoring. The turbo showed signs of being over-oiled, so we installed a restrictor.
This time it lasts somewhere in the 800 mile range before the smoke show returns. Same story....worn journal bearings, no scoring or bluing on the shaft. Possibly still getting too much oil we think; we decided to remove the restrictor and move the oil source to the head.
This time the turbo lasts somewhere in the 1200 mile range before taking a shit on him while he's visiting friends in Georgia, a few hundred miles from home. This time the turbo developed a ton of in/out play, destroying both the turbine and compressor wheels.
....and that's how you throw $800 down the drain over a turbo that cannot be oiled properly on a DSM. We tried every oil source possible, two different feed lines, tons of different drain configurations, and the turbo ended up as a paperweight after one season. The turbo did make some decent power- 457whp @ 34psi on pump gas with Meth injection; but it was far too unreliable to be considered a good option that I would recommend as an upgrade.
However there are guys that use these turbos and love them; to each their own. Another buddy of mine ran a SBR G60 fed from the head for an entire season with not a single issue.
I prefer Holsets....the come from the factory built to handle boost in the 30's and 40's on diesels. No jacking around with 270* and "upgraded" 360* thrust plates....ALL HX35/40 cartridges use a 360* thrust plate and a thrust collar that's the size of a half dollar right from the factory.
I've been eye humping the HX35, HX40, BW256, BW258, BW259. (Not sure if all of them come in a bolt on housing)
Thanks Justin,
Tom
PS: Should I start a new thread to discuss?