The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Wastegate recirc or dump?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Hiitman

15+ Year Contributor
482
3
May 12, 2004
Colorado Spring, Colorado
So who does what? What are the pros/cons of dumping or recirculating your wastegate? Also, sorry if this has been covered but when I searched recirculation all I got was info about bovs.
 
I have my wg dump tube "dumped". I think the main benefit for recirculating the dump tube for the wg would be sound minimization. As far as a decrease in performance, I dont think you will even notice one.
 
You also will not be able to pass inspection if you have it dumped
Really? I passed tech up at fontana with mine dumped.

That's probably what you're looking for (unless you have the wastegate off the manifold).

I do

Also the guys at rre told me that sometimes a dump pipe can cause phantom knock from the pulse of the exhaust. Is this true?
 
That link didn't work. What did you search?
 
Good idea. I was trying to figure something out when I would search GM 3.5 bar.
Technically, dumping a wastegate will mess with the A/F readings that you would get from a wideband, because you're allowing out, the oxygen that the O2 senses that's leftover from burning.

Would it throw them off this much?
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
A dumped wastegate should theoretically only slow down the readings of the wideband, not alter it. The only time a wideband should have altered readings is if it's
1. Uncalibrated
2. Sensor's dead
3. Exhaust leak, which could suck air into the exhaust and thus lean out the air/fuel mixture
4. Located behind a catalytic converter or something similar
 
A dumped wastegate should theoretically only slow down the readings of the wideband, not alter it. The only time a wideband should have altered readings is if it's
1. Uncalibrated
2. Sensor's dead
3. Exhaust leak, which could suck air into the exhaust and thus lean out the air/fuel mixture
4. Located behind a catalytic converter or something similar

I agree. While the exhaust gases come out in a pulse, the length of the tube should keep any reversion and outside o2 from getting into the exhaust stream. The WG only opens when there is a large amount of pressure in the manifold anyway.

Edit: In theory.
 
I first ran my 3052 setup with the WG dumped externally, then I had a section welded in to recirculate it back into my down pipe about a foot down. As far as a differece in WB readings, I didn't notice any. Not saying there weren't any at all, just if they did change, it wasn't enough for me to take note of. Some people argue that a recirculated WG will slow spool. This is the reason why I wanted mine dumped back into the downpipe instead of the O2 housing. This way the turbulance would be created much further away from the turbine wheel. Mine was dumped back in at an angle that wasn't perpendicular with exhaust flow to minimize the turbulance. As for the difference in spool, same thing if there was a difference it was very minimal, maybe like 50 rpms or something. The biggest difference is obviously sound. Personally I didn't mind how loud it was but to me it also wasn't a good sound. Basically sounded like a cars who CAT has blown a hole in it everytime I'd get close to full boost. I was always worried about who was around me (cops) & I would much rather hear my GT BB center section spool, then what sounded lika a large exhaust leak. For me internal routing was the much better choice & passing emissions visual isn't an issue this way.
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top