kicker91laser
20+ Year Contributor
- 426
- 3
- Jan 1, 2003
-
Desoto,
Missouri
Which one spools the quickest? I am not looking at the amount of power one could make vs the other, just spool.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I don't know for sure wich one will spool faster, but if I were to guess I would think that the bep would spool a tiny bit faster than a true twinscroll setup by maybe 1-200 rpms. I do think the twinscroll would help with mpg because of the increased VE. I'm going the twinscroll rought.
I have'nt heard of BEP housings being choked out too easy?
Then you don't look. Anyone pushing the BEP hit it's limits real quick. Just look, every stock hotside hx35 (7,8 blade, WH1C) makes more power than almost any BEP hotsided holset. Seems like most BEP HX40's are lucky to get out of the 12's and pull 115mph traps. My first time ever at the drags I went 11.85@121 on a $125 T3 WH1C, on a cheap SFP T4 mani with an adaptor plate. Then I went 12.10's@116 the next weekend on 93oct. You can buy cast t3 manifolds on ebay for next to nothing, no reason to handicap yourself with a BEP housing.
450whp and 685whp is what they have made. That would keep you in the 12s? Less forum and more driving!
1/8 Mile: 7.723 @ 94.770
60' Time: 1.809
I ran an 8.0 @ 90.00 with a junk tune with a 1.68 60ft. That was on a "choked" down td05 20g though
Ya, those are the exceptions. Vast majority doesn't see those results tho!
450whp and 685whp is what they have made. That would keep you in the 12s? Less forum and more driving!
1/8 Mile: 7.723 @ 94.770
60' Time: 1.809
I ran an 8.0 @ 90.00 with a junk tune with a 1.68 60ft. That was on a "choked" down td05 20g though
How much power you plan on making?More than an hx35 can make, but with the response
It will be on an automatic, so the lower the rpms that I can make hp/tq, the tighter I can build the converter and be alot more streetable, plus have a helluva lot more useable power.
The 685 was on a t3 bep .55 a/r housing not the mitsu flanged housing if I remember correctly.
I would have to say twin scroll housing. Mr. Peepers car spools like a freak! I think in 3rd gear getting 30psi shortly after 3krpm! I think it would be hard to beat that.
The 685 was on a t3 bep .55 a/r housing not the mitsu flanged housing if I remember correctly.
I would have to say twin scroll housing. Mr. Peepers car spools like a freak! I think in 3rd gear getting 30psi shortly after 3krpm! I think it would be hard to beat that.
It was; but the a/r of both housings is the same (.55), so the end flow result will be the same. It doesn't matter how wide the mouth of the housing is when the volute width and nozzle area is the same.The 685 was on a t3 bep .55 a/r housing not the mitsu flanged housing if I remember correctly.
How much power you plan on making?More than an hx35 can make, but with the response
It will be on an automatic, so the lower the rpms that I can make hp/tq, the tighter I can build the converter and be alot more streetable, plus have a helluva lot more useable power.
Mr. Peepers picked up a clean auto awd 91 which I believe he plans to basically put his holset set up on the auto. With his set up I am sure he will be able to get up on the stock stall just fine without needing a restall converter. I guess we will find out!