same design?

[DSM "BISH"]

I was wondering if the turbo 2.0 liter 4g63 is the same as the naturally aspiated 2.0 liter 4g63's and if not what are the differences besdies on is turbo and the other is not?


thanks

 

[zhjiln]

yes ... same thing outside except the N/A 4g63 has weaker internals but higher compression, no turbo (obviously) ... makes the same 140-ish horsepower as the 420A motor ...

N/A 4g63 motor is only in canada, europe, japan ....

 

[Rob10_99]

NA's were 90-late 91 as well for 4g63's

 

[zhjiln]

oh right they are in the 1Gs i forget... they had the 1.8 and 2.0 's ....

 

[Ahnubus_29]

Actually guys the N/A 4G63 2.0L was in all N/A cars built from 90-94 it was the engine they used in the models of cars that were not the base models which got the 1.8L motors, but also were not the high end cars with turbos. The N/A 4G63 2.0L heads cams are different then the turbos and it is also missing a few of the sensors like the knock sensor that the turbo motors have, but the internals are the same as the turbo motors just with a higher compression.

 

[AlphaVision]

I don't know about 1G's but my old 2G N/A 4G63 had no holes on the block for piston lubrication. Is it the same with US 1G N/A's

 

[Rob10_99]

I believe the 93+ can be found with 1.8L's, but the 1ga's are pure 4g63 2L engines. (fact?)

The NT pistons are more than different in the CR, ringlands and such are very weak vs the turbo pistons.

 

[ilco187]

your right about that but thats for eagle only

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/39/Talon_Eclipse_Laser_production.png

there is a 1ga in my area with a 1.8

 

[Rob10_99]

Well that makes sense, I've owned 6 of these damned things now, all but one was an eagle.