DanaT
10+ Year Contributor
- 65
- 0
- Nov 23, 2008
-
Europe & Colorado,
Europe
So I was thinking about the DSM setup.
It seems to me that a larger SMIC isn't as bad as many people think and that the best setup would be a liquid/air intercooler.
I think the BIG advantage of the FMIC is simply the size of intercooler that can be put in. After that, it is actually not as good of an idea because now engine cooling is affected. It disrupts flow to the radiator and also uses hotter air to cool the radiator. In additon, I have my doubts if it has as good of airflow as everyone believes.
I think the SMIC intercooler is in a very good location. Why? Because the SMIC has two sources of airflow. It has the higher pressure from the front scoops (so essentially it is a FMIC in a different location) but it has the advantage of being in the wheel well. Why does this help? Air flowing over the wheel wheel actually creates a negative pressure (vacuum). Many times it is easier to create flow with vacuum than with pressure. So while you have air pushing in fron the front, you have a negative pressure on the rear effectively increasing the pressure differential and theirby increasing flow.
So, looking at the dsign of the 2G eclipse front end (97+) there are two symetrical intakes with the passenger side having an intercooler and the drivers side having empty space with a block off. What seems to be the best design to me would be to run two small yet efficient (read motorcycle) radiators in these locations and then run a air/liquid intercooler.
But, in general, with the air flow characteristics, I think that for a given size of intercooler (that being having the same size) that the SMIC would be more efficient than the FMIC. Has anyone tried to put the stock SMIC in a FMIC position to see if it is the flow or size that is giving the FMIC intercoolers an advantage?
-Dana
It seems to me that a larger SMIC isn't as bad as many people think and that the best setup would be a liquid/air intercooler.
I think the BIG advantage of the FMIC is simply the size of intercooler that can be put in. After that, it is actually not as good of an idea because now engine cooling is affected. It disrupts flow to the radiator and also uses hotter air to cool the radiator. In additon, I have my doubts if it has as good of airflow as everyone believes.
I think the SMIC intercooler is in a very good location. Why? Because the SMIC has two sources of airflow. It has the higher pressure from the front scoops (so essentially it is a FMIC in a different location) but it has the advantage of being in the wheel well. Why does this help? Air flowing over the wheel wheel actually creates a negative pressure (vacuum). Many times it is easier to create flow with vacuum than with pressure. So while you have air pushing in fron the front, you have a negative pressure on the rear effectively increasing the pressure differential and theirby increasing flow.
So, looking at the dsign of the 2G eclipse front end (97+) there are two symetrical intakes with the passenger side having an intercooler and the drivers side having empty space with a block off. What seems to be the best design to me would be to run two small yet efficient (read motorcycle) radiators in these locations and then run a air/liquid intercooler.
But, in general, with the air flow characteristics, I think that for a given size of intercooler (that being having the same size) that the SMIC would be more efficient than the FMIC. Has anyone tried to put the stock SMIC in a FMIC position to see if it is the flow or size that is giving the FMIC intercoolers an advantage?
-Dana