rubbersidedown
20+ Year Contributor
- 792
- 2
- Sep 29, 2002
from the way he's built his engine it sounds to me that the advantages of the air/water cooler will far outway the disadvantage of the added weight. just my opinion though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Originally posted by autronicDSM
built for track as in drag or road racing? if it's drag racing then air/water is your top choice, otherwise air/air is the best bet
Hey try actually reading before you respond with that excellent techOriginally posted by 90tsiguy
How much more effective is this for the track (primary purpose of the car)


Originally posted by 25psi
BTW in the engine pics why did he mount it near his engine, that's like te worst place for an intercooler especially without a hood scoop.
Oh ok I didn't know there was a heat exganger I thought it worked like an air/air ICOriginally posted by greyforestgst
do you know how a water/air works?
the only thing that needs to catch air is the heat exchanger for the liquid, which is out of view.
thats a pretty badass setup if you ask me. yeah, theyre suited mainly for the track, but they imo fit a lot better. instead of running your entire intake past the front bumper you can just route two little radiator hoses.
Originally posted by greyforestgst
yeah, theyre suited mainly for the track
Originally posted by RabidDonkeyBoy
hook up the proper equipment and a air-water IC and depending on what coolant you use for heat exchange. water can absorb 4X the amount of heat air will so you only need 1/4 if IC to get the job done.