kpt4321
20+ Year Contributor
- 3,385
- 17
- Jul 30, 2002
I agree with Jesse. I have never ever heard of this before. Sounds hella fishy.
....Kyle T.
....Kyle T.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Originally posted by thehyena
that's odd.... i improved performance on my 1.8 by having the exhaust go 2 1/4 to a 2" cat back and then open back up at the end with a 2 1/2" outlet and finally the muffler.
it generates a whole hell of a lot of backpressureOriginally posted by kpt4321
WTF is that supposed to mean? That was not worth anything.
....Kyle T.
Originally posted by thehyena
it generates a whole hell of a lot of backpressure
Why should the exhaust manifold pressure and the intake manifold pressure stay fairly close?Originally posted by DV8tion
If you can't find it on google it cant be real.
I only said it helps, I did'nt say it was responsible for keeping the rods together.
Exhaust manifold pressure should stay fairly close to intake manifold pressure, but in reality exhaust pressure stays higher because of the use of restrictive small AR turbine housings.
Originally posted by kpt4321
Nope, it does not makes sense.
You don't want no pressure differential, you want as (relatively) high a pressure on the intake side as possible. By that I mean that you want the pressure ratio across the chamber to be as much as possible.
....Kyle T.
Originally posted by LightningGSX
Isn't that what kpt4321 said above?