insanewayne
15+ Year Contributor
- 317
- 1
- May 18, 2004
-
Ladysmith,
Ok, so i've been dead set on doing a 2.4 using the 4gcs...but i'm on a budget to get it started...and the wicked deal i found sold on me...so i need some info on how to calcutale the amount of boring needed to put the 4gcs crank in the 4g63, and then bore the cylindes to make up the extra .1 L....also what is the formula for rod/stroke ratio, would it be better then the standard 2.3 stroker ratio of 1.5? or is piston size not a factor in the ratio.
I beleive the cylinder size must increase from the stock 85mm to 87mm... or so it says here.
http://www.pinktemple.com/stroker.html
But i don't know how to convert that to 0.xx" over ..but my calcutaions get .07874" over...
which is 2.376 L ??
These are all formulas i made up in my head...so i need somoene to post some good formulas for engine specs...or link...cuz it would be very useful for me at this descision point.
Ok I figured out the rod/stroke ratio formula....so 1.5 is all we can get out of it...i thought that cylinder diameter would play a factor...but no...so the most we could do is throw in a long rod option, (156mm rod) and get a 1.56 ratio...but really how bad is that? ...like i know 1.7 is ideal..and thats what our beloved 4G63 has....but im on a quest for torque and
fp3065 spoolage and 5-600 hp....so would i get decent cylinder filling at bdc and not too bad of cylinder wall wear with 1.56?
Ok so basically i need to know the details on this 2.4 4g63, who's done it, and maybe some more in-depth technical discussion.
Thanks guys
Wayne
I beleive the cylinder size must increase from the stock 85mm to 87mm... or so it says here.
http://www.pinktemple.com/stroker.html
But i don't know how to convert that to 0.xx" over ..but my calcutaions get .07874" over...
which is 2.376 L ??
These are all formulas i made up in my head...so i need somoene to post some good formulas for engine specs...or link...cuz it would be very useful for me at this descision point.
Ok I figured out the rod/stroke ratio formula....so 1.5 is all we can get out of it...i thought that cylinder diameter would play a factor...but no...so the most we could do is throw in a long rod option, (156mm rod) and get a 1.56 ratio...but really how bad is that? ...like i know 1.7 is ideal..and thats what our beloved 4G63 has....but im on a quest for torque and
fp3065 spoolage and 5-600 hp....so would i get decent cylinder filling at bdc and not too bad of cylinder wall wear with 1.56?
Ok so basically i need to know the details on this 2.4 4g63, who's done it, and maybe some more in-depth technical discussion.
Thanks guys
Wayne
)