BC 2.6L stoker?

[bastarddsm]

Not really. Its $3500. A decent 2.0 will break trannys. What do you think a 2.6 will do?

Theres an old saying by Smokey Yunick, Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races. Well it doesn't apply to DSM's. Our saying is Horsepower wins races, torque just destroys dsm transmissions.

Conversely, I want to build an open light rally car, and the 2.6 would be great for that, but it has way to expensive of parts in it for an n/a motor.

 

[JOEY A]

Strokers are great for street cars for more usable power. It all comes down to piston speed and what you building more.


FWD cars stay away from stroker motors


Look at SRT4s spin city with the 2.4 thats all they do

 

[MidShipCivic]

IT is a kit to get 2.6..Whats the difference, just the crank and stroke..So instead of using the 2.4 crank you use the kit, and bam 2.6?

No one builds motors for pistons speeds.
A 4g63 has a shorter deck height, that's why you cannot use it.

It has custom length rods, pistons and a 106mm crankshaft.

Unsure why a fwd would want this you will have no traction and busted transmissions.

There is an evo that uses this kit he road races and does all type of things with it.

It's below the recommended geometry for a performance engine though (under 1.50 rod stroke ratio)

on Mr.Alex - EVO 2.VI TME - 700HK? - zatzy.com