Any new info on 264/272 vs 272/272 cam on a small16g?

[spadepro22]

I've researched old threads about these cam/combos and I want to now what you guys are running now on the small/evo 16g or is there any new results. What head work is also needed if any? This is a dd and will never see above 7k shifts.

 

[goodbuds]

no head work is needed both combos will run very nice. it's going to be a fun car, cams and a s16g. those things kick like donkeys. just as long as you dont try to chase down Toretto

 

[spadepro22]

Im running 18psi now, sometimes I see 20, but I dont want to lose any bottom end.

 

[dsmGSTtuner]

my friend has 272/272 and it runs like a raped ape but he is always saying that he should have went 264/272 because the 272 is a little too big for the intake cam. i think he said it kinda puts a back spin on the turbo or something like that. i plan on doing 264/272 as well! are you leaning to either side?

 

[spadepro22]

my friend has 272/272 and it runs like a raped ape but he is always saying that he should have went 264/272 because the 272 is a little too big for the intake cam. i think he said it kinda puts a back spin on the turbo or something like that. i plan on doing 264/272 as well! are you leaning to either side?

More towards the combo. Ive researched good things about both, but the combo seems to have better results in mid range. The 272's seem to do better up top, but I dont plain on shifting past 7k.