flashy
Probationary Member
- 25
- 0
- Apr 16, 2003
Does anyone have or know anything about a performance chip for the 2G n/t dms. I hear of people adding 30hp with them. Just haven't heard of people with DSM's doing it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
flashy said:Does anyone have or know anything about a performance chip for the 2G n/t dms. I hear of people adding 30hp with them. Just haven't heard of people with DSM's doing it.
I'm guessing that it's the only model with a programable ECU, kind of like the eprom for the 4g guys. That might not be right so don't quote me until we have coroberation from the other n/t guysflashy said:Does anyone know what is different about a 97? I was always under the impression that the only difference from a 95096 to a 97-99 was front and rear bumper, side skirts and lights.
Redmachine said:I'm guessing that it's the only model with a programable ECU, kind of like the eprom for the 4g guys. That might not be right so don't quote me until we have coroberation from the other n/t guys
? And further more, what is the story with the AF/X 97 ECU? Have not heard of it yet. I have a 97 and am interested in tuning it. Hi jack the thread a little by not searching? Well, maybe
manual transmissionbullettdsm said:At the risk of facing the wrath of GSGoinFast; ya couldn't let Flashy get by without a wiseass comment, huh? And further more, what is the story with the AF/X 97 ECU? Have not heard of it yet. I have a 97 and am interested in tuning it. Hi jack the thread a little by not searching? Well, maybe
![]()
Oh yeah, what is a 97 MT?
bullettdsm said:At the risk of facing the wrath of GSGoinFast; ya couldn't let Flashy get by without a wiseass comment, huh? And further more, what is the story with the AF/X 97 ECU? Have not heard of it yet. I have a 97 and am interested in tuning it. Hi jack the thread a little by not searching? Well, maybe
![]()
Oh yeah, what is a 97 MT?

flashy said:Does anyone have or know anything about a performance chip for the 2G n/t dms. I hear of people adding 30hp with them. Just haven't heard of people with DSM's doing it.
dr1665 said:I've seen enough of these threads about chips to know enough to skim the comments for what I wanted to mention. Since I didn't see it, I will say this to anyone with a 420A who wants an electronic mod for their ECU that will grow with them as they build the car.
Megasquirt.
You can build it yourself or you can find others to sell them complete and you install it. They cost less than the SAFC and give you total fuel and ignition control. It's a stand alone, but not a full stand alone. You will still need your ECU, but it will no longer have anything to do with fuel or spark calculations.
The AFX ECU makes power by moving a couple limiters up or removing them altogether, by changing fuel maps and advancing timing (why people are so scared to boost with them). Guess what? You have a MSnS (Megasquirt n Spark), you can adjust your own fuel maps and advance timing all you want.
You need to do your homework on this one, but I'm telling you. I've been talking to people going to the shootout this year and almost everyone is installing MSnS on their cars. Nitrous, turbo, all motor. You can tune for anything and all of them at the same time. If you're seriously interested in this level-the-playing-field item, head over to Megasquirt forums and read up some of the posts about the 420A.
I'm building a 9,000rpm, high-compression (big, classified at this time) turbocharged 420A this summer with water and maybe even nitrous injection. The MSnS is making it not only possible, but almost easy too.
Forget chips and that. Do it up right my 420A brothers.![]()
Yeah, amen to that!Redmachine said:carbs are a hell of alot easier to tune than computer controlled fuel injection. 2 to 3 screws thats it, and it can be done by sound.
Let me put it this way:bullettdsm said:Ok dr1665, this is the point that I am at. I need to decide stand alone, ECU, MegaSquirt, SAFC etc.
(insert Tim, the Tool Man, Taylor, style grunting here)bullettdsm said:I am old school engine builder and we did eveything by carb + cam.
If you know things like which AFR you want to be running when and where, or what sort of voltage you need to see from the wideband O2 and what to do with ignition timing in order to avoid knock in order for your engine to be happy at the limits of tune, then you could figure this out.bullettdsm said:how difficult it is to tune for a novice computer guy who understands cars (and has raced strip and off road)?
Haha. Good times. I'd wait to have the spare block ready to go in before getting gnarly with the stocker. Buddy of mine here has stated he will be going to the track with a flatbed and a truck when his 2.4L long block is ready to go in, as he will be cranking up the boost to 15-20psi on his old stocker.bullettdsm said:I am just about done with the bolt-on thing and will not do my internals untill I blow up engine.
With these modern, computer controlled cars, you have to be able to either bypass or replace the stock ECU in order to really go places. The factory ECU is designed to cater to the lowest common denominator: the drievr who just drives the car. How boring is that?bullettdsm said:Tuning seems to be impossible without the before mentioned computer add-ons.
The only problem I have with the MSnS is its overly ### sounding name. I mean, come on! Who wants to tell other gear heads they installed something called Megasquirt in their car? Sure, it's the absolute best value in terms of price, features and ease of use, but that name is so bad. Ugh.bullettdsm said:All things being equal, I would like to go with Mega.
Personally, although I have yet to install this, I think that it is more important you know what you need your car to be doing than to be computer literate.bullettdsm said:In your opinion, what's the learning curve for someone who is computer literate but not a programmer?

MSnS (for Megasquirt'n'Spark), which is what everyone I know calls it, is capable of performing all the fuel calculations it needs all the way up to ~15,000rpm. You would need to balance the hell out of any engine running anywhere close to those speeds, but I'm building for a 9,000rpm redline. Add my high compression, tall Crower cams, and a fat turbo with some decent lag, I'm thinking this will be one hell of a summer vacation. Even if that vacation is only the two weeks I take driving to and from the DSM Shootout in Ohio come August.GSGoinFast said:DR: Can the mega squirt raise the rev limiter of the engine?
