ilco187
10+ Year Contributor
- 1,706
- 7
- Jan 3, 2009
-
Niles,
Michigan
This was on my old 1g and i never took it off when i sold it and im trying to find another.
Attachments
You must be registered for see attachments list
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Kind of reminds me of those o2 eliminator setups that RRE use to have, but that was like a full DP with an o2 housing built into it.
This was on my old 1g and i never took it off when i sold it and im trying to find another.

I'm not sure if yours is exactly the same as mine, but mine is definitely the same design. Mine is made by a company that's no longer in business called ATR.
Not sure what your talking about " Buying a quality SS piece "
1. It is SS mines just dirty, 2. Good luck finding a 3" O2 housing that isn't $500
I absolutely love mine, have had it well over 5 years. My only gripe is that it uses a 3 bolt downpipe flange. Other than that, have fun with your bottleneck 2.5'' O2 housings.
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
Really? Hold a magnet to it.
I'd rather spend $500 for an O2 housing that isn't a complete POS in design and implementation.
Here you go.
ATR 3" Stainless O2-Housing Eliminator Downpipe KitYou must be logged in to view this image or video.
And how do you figure its complete POS in design. IMO divided O2 housing = POS design. Had creep problems with 2.5" tubular, switched to this, no creep.
Everyone's entitled to their opinion though.
Yes, they made a SS version, and an aluminized steel version. Hold a magnet to it.
It's not about opinion. Check where the wastegate re-entry is compared to the turbine discharge...
If you look at the turbine discharge flow, it's directed RIGHT into the wastegate recirc. If you don't see this as a problem, enjoy your exhaust back pressure and slow spool.
I used to own one. I'm glad it's off my car.
Last post. It is your opinion. Unless you can prove your statements, they are opinions.
Even if the discharge is directed towards the waste-gate recirc it certainly isn't going to create more back pressure than 1. a 2.5" outlet vs a 3" outlet, 2. The needle dick recirc that divided o2 housings have.
I can't back up my statements with facts but neither can you. So we're back to square one.
But I can say in my personal experience, I've had this O2 housing on a 14b, 16g, PTE 50 Trim, and now my HTA68 and I've had better spool than any other O2 I've ever used.
Use whatever you want and I'll do the same.
I'm a mechanical engineer, what's your degree in?
My "opinion" happens to be based in a field of thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, and physics, not what "looks good".
I was unaware that a piece of paper hanging on your wall proved anything at all? Try again.
HA. Downplay an actual mechanical engineering degree as just a meaningless piece of paper. Shows a lot about your failure in education.

Please. I didn't say it was meaningless, congratulations, it takes a lot of hard work to get an engineering degree. It still doesn't prove or disprove anything we're talking about.
I work with engineers everyday designing medical devices and I wonder how some of them graduated high school, let alone college. Some of them are the most intelligent people I've ever met, some are dumb as rocks. Just because you're an engineer, doesn't mean you're right.
For supposedly being so smart you sure are quick to downplay people, which shows a lot about your character.
I discredit no one until they show an obvious ignorance in the field they're trying to argue.
a) your lack of ability to properly utilize the different versions of you, your, and you're shows that my efforts here are wasted on yet another worthless T00ner.
b) if you could see the path of fluidic flow based on standard physics principles that I can, you wouldn't even be trying to make this point.
Albeit, the OEM o2 housing is lesser in diameter (pressure drop being negated here), the wastegate re-entry path is NOT in line with the turbine discharge flow path, and re-enters at an angle much more inclined for more laminar flow. If you could see this, you would simply stop arguing your point.
You may think you've purchased some of the "latest uber hawtness" in exhaust fabrication, but you would be far from the limelight.
Lmao, excuse me, I was unaware I was writing a paper for English class, i'll try harder to use proper grammar for you.
I'm done arguing with you, real world experience > your theoretical situations you read in a book.
And latest uber hawtness? Far from it. Nor did I imply that. V-Band > All
Keep trollin, I'll see you around I'm sure. btw, not putting myself over, but go look at my build thread before you start calling me a " worthless T00ner " I may not have a degree in engineering, but if there is one thing I can say with certainty, it's that I'm far from that.

I used to own one of these o2 eliminators. Hindsight, horrible design. Wastegate re-entry path is way too steep causing too much turbulence in the main post-turbine exhaust stream (post turbine is directed DIRECTLY at the wastegate dump). The welds will eventually crack on you.
My advice, pull it off, buy a quality SS unit that has the waste gate dump coming back in at a better (more acute) angle farther in the exhaust path.
I'm a mechanical engineer, what's your degree in?
My "opinion" happens to be based in a field of thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, and physics, not what "looks good".