silkcity100
20+ Year Contributor
- 100
- 0
- Feb 23, 2003
-
paterson,
New Jersey
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
silkcity100 said:what makes you think a 2g manifold flows more then these ebay manifolds? it has the same design as one of the dnp manifolds,it has bigger runners then the 2g,and its almost a equal length,which the 2g is not even close,the ebay manifolds have runners that have air moving from top to bottom flow as where the 2g flows straight then turns almost to a 90 degree turn
silkcity100 said:just have to figure out which one to get first,but will show results
silkcity100 said:im going to have my 2g ported and do the dyno tune probably in 2 weeks,still building the car, then i should be able to find a tubular if i dont like the results and dyno it to see if any differences
b16edcrxblitz said:Theres a reason why shearer, fullrace and victory performance manifolds are 6x the cost of the ones you posted. All of them will out perform and outlast any ebay manifold. I'd say if cash is kind of tight get a dnp. There great manifolds but arent quite as much as the ones I listed above. I use a victory performance manifold and I have no regrets on spending the extra money for it.
Exactly. I forgot to mention that.Scrymerr said:In addition to the quality and performance, some of the big guys offer lifetime warranties. Can't beat that.

1993eclipseGS said:A: Did you drive the car with this tubular manifold on yet? If so, For how long?
B: Did you take the car to a dyno, To PROVE that your testaments are true about this tubular manifold being ''better'' then a ported 2g manifold?
C: What exactly does sitting a manifold next to another one hafto do with anything? That would honestly be like sitting a 500whp ford festiva with 1 door, Next to a 200whp BRAND NEW car right off the show room floor. It DOES NOT matter how good the product looks, It is how it performs.
D: I have actually tried a ''less-expensive" manifold.. It failed. I then got a free one under warentee, It FAILED AGAIN.. Got ANOTHER one, And sold it.. Got email from the buyer months down the road saying it failed with very few street driven miles on it.
E: Where did you see these ''tubular manifolds'' in action? What kind of setup was this on? Do you or the person who put these parts to ''action'' have track times or dyno numbers of before and after?
Thanks.

1993eclipseGS said:Do you have any personal experience with ANY of these types of manifolds? I know I did, And alot others have also. Did you EVER see any of these ebay type manifolds in person, Holding it in your hands? I'm sure you woulden't be ranting and raving about how much ''bigger'' the inside of the manifold is on these tubular style manifolds from places like this.
Either way, Get one if you want... But when you want a 2g ported manifold again, Port your stock one and get it back on the car. The stock 2g manifold is way more then sufficent for you.

So... do you or do you not have numbers proving that the manifold is better than a 2G ported? This post doesn't answer any questions as to whether the ebay manifold actually resulted in any gains. You two can go all night asking each other if they have proof either way. Someone show real numbers.Slippi84 said:1) Yes I have run this manifold and this was back when it was not as good as the new style manifolds(better welds and brakcets not to mention the thickness of the overall header seems increased)
2) Did you run a SIMILAR manifold or this exact same manofold. Cause everyone has run the old style or another manifold that looked like or could have been the same one but unless it was the exact same one that's not first hand experience.
3) Do YOU have any experience dyno or track times that prove the 2g manifold is better.
I used the old style with my 50 trim setup with no problems for about 3 months of hard racing. I sold the whole setup and started building up my present setup. Funny thing is I liked the manifold and the price was so good I bought another one with the o2 housing in a package for 200 less than a dnp header alone. I will have dyno tape and time slips in the next month and will start a thread that will shut up all the nay sayers for a little while untill they come up with more bs to complain about.