cj8990
10+ Year Contributor
- 97
- 1
- Mar 20, 2010
-
Chicago,
Illinois
Need a quick clarification. Piston valve clearance, when measured from the top with a dial gauge, does not actually measure the clearance between the valve and piston but the amount of travel the valve has along the axis of the valve stem before hitting the piston.
When measuring with the clay method however you measure the vertical distance, which would be the distance from the closest point on the radial edge of the valve to the surface of the piston.
Maybe I have something wrong here but when people talk about piston valve clearance which one is the actual correct specification, since these would definitely be different measurements due to the angle the valve stem makes with the top of the piston?
This also makes me wonder.. why do people go through all the trouble of laying clay, assembling the whole engine, disassembly, then measure clay? Couldn't you just use a measured angle the valve stem makes with the deck of the block, valve radius, and the valve travel at TDC you get with the dial method to calculate the same dimension the clay method achieves?
-Corey
When measuring with the clay method however you measure the vertical distance, which would be the distance from the closest point on the radial edge of the valve to the surface of the piston.
Maybe I have something wrong here but when people talk about piston valve clearance which one is the actual correct specification, since these would definitely be different measurements due to the angle the valve stem makes with the top of the piston?
This also makes me wonder.. why do people go through all the trouble of laying clay, assembling the whole engine, disassembly, then measure clay? Couldn't you just use a measured angle the valve stem makes with the deck of the block, valve radius, and the valve travel at TDC you get with the dial method to calculate the same dimension the clay method achieves?
-Corey