flaatr
10+ Year Contributor
- 265
- 1
- Oct 18, 2010
-
San Jose,
California
Which do you run and why?
Trying to decide which way to go.
-Raffi
Trying to decide which way to go.
-Raffi
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Don't get the filtered one like that. This causes unmetered air to come into the motor.
you could still use the pcv valve to prevent this.
Don't get the filtered one like that. This causes unmetered air to come into the motor.
Get the sealed version and you can put it in your choice of 2 places.
Bewteen the intake and valve cover breather port.
Or between the PCV valve and the nipple on the intake manifold.
http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/articles-engine-fuel/366890-4g63t-pcv-system.html
Read that first and ask questions later.
You could still use the PCV valve to prevent this.
I think maybe the Doom forgot that the 4g63 has a MAF sensor and the 420a doesn't. The first quote is correct the ECU will lean out the fuel if a vented catch can is used. Granted knowing how much preasure the VC is pulling in and its effect on the fuel map and it's consequential negative effect in combination with leaning out a turbo system is possible, however, the mathematical equations and technical data needed would far out weight buying a non vented can. In laymans terms don't vent it.
not true about about leaning out. i have mine like that the fuel trims are perfect.
Hmm interesting, looking at your mod list it looks like you have done some tunning though I wonder if you increased the fuel trims to compensate? Not trying to argue it's just everything I've read has pointed to doing this on a stock engine will lean out the fuel. Do you have anymore data to support this? I don't have a 4g63 but my friend has a wrx and a tunned ecu for higher boost and we are preparing to install a catch can we didn't want to screw up the tune and have to take it back in.
It's purpose is to allow clean air in to the valve cover, where it normally exits out of the PCV valve. The "other" end of the valve cover breather hose is connected to the air intake., which provides nicely filtered air.
Unfortunately, DSM engines don't always work that way. As it turns out, there is often enough pressure in the engine to force air out of the breather hose, rather than in. This doesn't usually happen a lot, but it does happen under certain operating conditions. Thus, instead of clean air being drawn in through the breather hose, oily air can sometimes escape out. Contributing factors for this are excessive crankcase pressure, a relatively small PCV valve, and poor isolation inside the valve cover between the breather hose (the inlet) and the PCV valve (the outlet).
This also means that the engine can suck in small amounts of engine oil through the hose as well, since the other end is connected to the air intake. Over time, the oil will dirty up the inside of most of the intake piping, including the intercooler and turbo. Obviously a dirty intercooler does not work as well as a clean one, and most people don't like the idea of anything other than air getting in to the turbo.
It is important to note that the car was designed this way, and there is no real harm or damage by leaving things the way they are - however ineffective the whole system might seem. However, some people prefer to keep the trace oil out of their intake.
Point being said is "THERE IS NO UN-METERED AIR" its not a vacuum source.
I am on the stock 2g maf.
Which on these 3 methods would be best.
All delete the PCV valve.
1. 2 ins and vent
2. 2 ins and 1 out to the intake
3. 2 ins and 2 out to the intake