The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Official silicone coupler sizing thread.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

90 GSX

15+ Year Contributor
322
2
Jun 24, 2004
Fremont, California
EDIT: For anybody that searches for coupler sizing....

The 2g mas is a 3.75" coupler. A 3.5" fits but it's a very tight fit. The 4" is too large. The circumference of the 2g mas is 11.8", do the calculation yourself if you want, but 3.75" is the correct size.

The 16g inlet is 2.25" without the black rubber spacer, and 2.5 with the spacer. Either one will work.

---------------

The third commandment... thou shalt not post information on this forum when you have never done it yourself and obviously don't know what you are talking about.

:beatentodeath:

Fin
 
RotaryRyan said:
I don't think he was saying anything about a GM MAF. Just the stock DSM 2g MAS.
Please note the thread title and the fact that he also talks about a 16G turbo. and the 3" GM mas is another common couple size that people get wrong by trying to fit a 3" on it.
 
I love this thread, the overall idea is brilliant. Let me quote you (with a modification) to show my support of your efforts...

The FIRST commandment... thou shalt not post information on this forum when you have never done it yourself and obviously don't know what you are talking about.
:thumb: :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
 
90 GSX said:
After seeing people say that the outlet on the 2g mas is 4" and that the 16g inlet is 2.75 I'd like to correct the problem so that people don't buy expensive silicone couplers to put their new intake system and have them be the wrong size (ie me).

The first commandment, a 2g mas needs a 3.5" coupler, I repeat 3.5", not 4", not 3.75", 3.5" no more no less.

The second commandment, a 16g inlet needs a 2.5" coupler, not a 2.75", not a 3", not a 2.25", not a 2.2945, a 2.5" coupler. An evo3 will be a tight fit but 2.37" will still be to big.

The third commandment... thou shalt not post information on this forum when you have never done it yourself and obviously don't know what you are talking about.

:beatentodeath:


Just wanted to say thanks. I bought a 3.5" coupler and it fits nice and snug. A 4" may work but the 3.5" is perfect and I'm glad I got the 3.5" and not the 4" :thumb:
 
How did you get a 3.5" coupler on the 2g mas? I just installed the FP intake on a 2g and used a 4" coupler, it fits perfectly. The inlet of the 16g's is 2.25", I have one sitting on my shelf and a 2.25" coupler fits it perfectly, if you put a 2.5" on there it would be way too loose.

I'm changing your first commandment: Thou shalt not post measurements when you can't read a tape measure.
 
Here's the compressor inlet of a busted big 16g, notice how 2.5" is way to big for the inlet?
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
90 GSX said:
After seeing people say that the outlet on the 2g mas is 4" and that the 16g inlet is 2.75 I'd like to correct the problem so that people don't buy expensive silicone couplers to put their new intake system and have them be the wrong size (ie me).

Just for future reference, you could have figured this out before wasting $ on couplers. Measure the circumference of the outlet and then divide that # by 3.14 (pi) and it will give you the diameter of the coupler needed. This also applies to the inlet, whether it is square, oval, or rectangular shaped.
 
2bclutch said:
GVR4592 is 100% correct. A 16G inlet requires a 2".. trust me.

attachment.php


Its 2.25".
 
I'm telling people what I did to make it work, plain and simple. I made this post to clarify the BS in other posts that led me astray, and you have come back to reinforce the same BS numbers that I just said did not work. And if you know anything about science, you would know that you should expect the unexpected. Taking a measurement is not enough to get a definitive answer. You have to take into account the lip on the turbo inlet, the rubber ring, variations in coupler sizes etc. etc. You can trust your ever so accurate tape measure, I'll trust my experience.

You may be right that a 2.25" coupler would fit on a 16g but a 2.5" coupler fits better, especially with the rubber ring around the inlet. If you don't believe me try it yourself. I'd like to see you get a 2.25" coupler around an evo3, silicon multi ply couplers don't stretch very easily. Lastly, I don't care what FP sells with their kits, or whether they say it's 4" or not. If it fits on the 2g mas, it is NOT a 4" coupler and there's nothing you could say or do to convince me otherwise because I've seen it, felt it, smelled it, etc. and I know that the 2g mas doesn't use a 4" coupler. In fact, it is significantly oversized. Why don't you bust out that tape measure of yours and measure that coupler. I'm willing to bet that never even measured it, you probably just got it from FP and read that it was 4". FP is not omniscient and I won't treat them as such. Everybody on this forum posts up that the 2g mas needs a 4" coupler, but how come chicagoavenger used a 3.5" and it fit perfectly? I'd be willing to bet that half of those people have never seen a 2g mas hooked up to an intake pipe other than when they were browsing the FP website or they were just quoting BS they read in another post... By the way FP has awesome products, but apparently their numbers are a little off.

Knowing that C=piD is not the problem. I probably would have measured it first but 2 things prevented me from doing that: 1) I was out of town when i ordered the couplers and 2) 80 bazillion board members said that the inlet is 2.75" and the 2g mas is 4". But you are right on one thing, it was my bad for not confirming the sizes myself, I'll give you that, but I still believe that simply measuring may not be enough to get the perfect coupler in many cases.

Lastly, I'd be hypocritical to say that you should trust my numbers over any other board member, but I've already had 2 people confirm those sizes so you can make the decision for yourself. Maybe try both... whatever pumps your rump.
 
My picture doesn't seem to be working but it was pretty obvious there is no way a 2.5" coupler would fit and seal properly on the 16g inlet. It measures 2.25", what's going to fill in the .5" gap? The FP 4" intake and 2g mas take a 4" coupler, I installed one the day before you started this thread and I used a 4" coupler from the local diesel supply shop, not from FP. I'm not quoting any BS, I installed these parts, and I know what couplers I bought. I measured the couplers, and they weren't 3.5" or 2.5", they were 2.25" and 4".

I don't have the FP intake with me to take more pictures but I do have the 16g and a 2.25"-2.5" reducer. I'll take pics of the coupler showing the 2.25" measurement of the reducer and how it fits perfectly on the 16g. I'll take a picture of the 2.5" side of the coupler and show that there is a large gap. I should have the pics up shortly.
 
The pictures aren't that great but you can clearly see the measurements.

Here's the inlet of the 16g

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


Here's the 2.25" side of the 2.25:-2.5" coupler

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


Here's the 2.5" side of the reducer, this pic sucks but you can still see if you look closely.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


Here's the 2.25" side of the coupler installed on the turbo

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


Here's a shot down the inlet with the 2.25" side installed on the turbo, you can see it's a perfect fit.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


Here's the 2.5" side of the reducer installed, you can see the huge gap

You must be logged in to view this image or video.



And a side view


You must be logged in to view this image or video.
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
GVR4592
DSM Wiseman


Car: 92 Galant VR-4
From: Bellingham, Washington
Region: Pacific Northwest
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,715

^^^^^^^^
With Pics confirming


VS.
90 GSX
Proven Member


Car: 90 Eclipse GSX
From: Fremont, California
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 207

with no pics and a defensive attitude
 
Ok, i was curious since this is starting to turn ugly. I have a spare 2g mas and various couplers in my utility room.

GVR4592 is completely correct that the 2g mas takes a 4" coupler ...... provided it is reinforced

90 GSX.... A 3.5" will only fit if it a single ply coupler.......it will stretch to fit.



Both are correct, but there were details missing
 
2gAWDTalon said:
GVR4592
DSM Wiseman


Car: 92 Galant VR-4
From: Bellingham, Washington
Region: Pacific Northwest
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,715

^^^^^^^^
With Pics confirming


VS.
90 GSX
Proven Member


Car: 90 Eclipse GSX
From: Fremont, California
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 207

with no pics and a defensive attitude

If you actually look closely at the picture of the measurement on the turbo inlet, the tape measure isn't even centered making the radius appear less than it actually is. If we are talking about a 1/4 inch difference (not 1/2" like you said earlier), you have to be a little more careful with your measurements. If you put the rubber ring around the inlet to make the transition from the lip to the rest of the inlet smooth, the 2.5" fits perfect.
 
tom04841 said:
Ok, i was curious since this is starting to turn ugly. I have a spare 2g mas and various couplers in my utility room.

GVR4592 is completely correct that the 2g mas takes a 4" coupler ...... provided it is reinforced

90 GSX.... A 3.5" will only fit if it a single ply coupler.......it will stretch to fit.



Both are correct, but there were details missing


Thanks for clearing that up, but like I said before, I bought a 4" -> 3" reducer from turbohoses.com (a very reputable place) and the 4" was VERY big. It had a 1/3 to 1/2" gap around the whole circumference. Take it or leave it.

EDIT: I just measured the circumference of a spare 2g mas I had to be 11.8".

11.8"/3.14 = 3.75"

So tell me again, how will you get a 4" coupler to seal on a 2g mas? Are you telling me that a plied silicon coupler is going to compress that far??? The 3.5" is a tight fit, but as chicago avenger said earlier, it was perfect.
 
tom04841 said:
Ok, i was curious since this is starting to turn ugly. I have a spare 2g mas and various couplers in my utility room.

GVR4592 is completely correct that the 2g mas takes a 4" coupler ...... provided it is reinforced

90 GSX.... A 3.5" will only fit if it a single ply coupler.......it will stretch to fit.



Both are correct, but there were details missing


This is what I bought http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/3-5-...ryZ38634QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem it is a single ply and took little effort to fit over the 2gmas and 3" intake pipe.
 
anyway.. my contribution to the post.. looks like a 2.5" will fit over the turbo WITH the rubber ring on it.. no rubber ring? 2.25"!!! I can't believe nobody figured this one out?

as far as 4" vs 3.5" it's a 3.75" just like you showed 90 GSX by measuring the circumfrance.... some 4" made by some companies obviously work, some 3.5" will stretch I'm sure.. but a 3.75" fits mint.


WTF? my post got edited? I'm not allowed to express my views? what is with this place? I wasn't rude or demeaning at all.. is that what DSMtuners is coming to? when someone posts something that may go against the hierarchical upper echelons of this forum is gets deleted? It's like George Orwell 1984!!!!

I'm Being oppressed! ROFL
 
Why is there confusion here? You take off the stock snorkle or whatever you are upgrading from and measure them.

And btw, the crappy coupler ring inserts that Dejon supplies with their curved intake pipe is shit. Get a true reducer coupler if you need one so you don't have gaps.
 
90 GSX said:
I got censored too when I told the guy who busted out his post counts that he was basically an idiot. I have no beef with mods but I've found that on this board more than any other, the mods make insignificant changes or they make changes before changes become necessary. IMO, they should only butt in when it's needed, and that guy really needed to know my thoughts about his post number stunt. Doesn't the board deserve to know that post counts don't mean diddly squat in terms of the accuracy of the information given by that person. Obviously, anybody who reads the entire post will see that my original information was not wrong. Oh well... Maybe my internet posting tone was a little too much for some. :rolleyes:


I posted pictures and you can clearly see your information was not correct.
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top