SpawnedX
Banned Member
- 4,016
- 56
- May 18, 2004
-
West Warwick,
Rhode Island
I would like to start off this post with simply stating this: I am not trying to put anyone down or be a jerk, I know not everyone can afford a top of the line model and if you are happy with your car then you understand what it means to be an enthusiast. I also understand there is nothing wrong with a non-4G63 engine and have no beef with anyone who has it or wants to be considered a DSMer, but I need some sort of general basis on this argument that seems to find it's way to every DSMer gathering I have been too.
I have a 4G63 as you can see by my 1997 Eclipse GST. What I want to know is if a non-4G63 is considered a DSM, meaning a 420A. DSM = Diamond Star Motors, which is a collaboration between Mitsu and Chrysler, which spawned the engine we affectionately know as the 4G63. The 420A engine, which is found in Eclipse RS and GS trims is an engine entirely developed by Chrysler. It is not a bad engine, but without argument it is in no means a match for the 4G63. I guess all I want to know is if someone who is driving an Eclipse/Talon/Laser that is not a 4G63, can we really include this as a DSM and why?
My opinion is no, but like I said, that is my opinion.
I have a 4G63 as you can see by my 1997 Eclipse GST. What I want to know is if a non-4G63 is considered a DSM, meaning a 420A. DSM = Diamond Star Motors, which is a collaboration between Mitsu and Chrysler, which spawned the engine we affectionately know as the 4G63. The 420A engine, which is found in Eclipse RS and GS trims is an engine entirely developed by Chrysler. It is not a bad engine, but without argument it is in no means a match for the 4G63. I guess all I want to know is if someone who is driving an Eclipse/Talon/Laser that is not a 4G63, can we really include this as a DSM and why?
My opinion is no, but like I said, that is my opinion.


.