The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

2G Evo 3 intake manifold

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

spydergstftw

10+ Year Contributor
144
0
Jul 4, 2010
Amarillo, Texas
I have a legitimate Evo 3 Intake Manifold and 1g turbo throttle body that I am looking on putting into my 2g. Is there anything that I will have to do to run these besides running a vacuum source for the mdp sensor. anything else? I have the gaskets and longer lines for the throttle body
 
2g intake manifold is going flow better for you. why switch it? Your not going to see a difference.
 
Longer intake runners coupled with smaller intake ports increase air velocity and cylinder filling. For quick spooling, low airflow turbo's, the 2g manifold and head is considered a better option than 1g/Evo3/SM intake manifolds on a 1g head.
 
:nono: Can you explain how??

Reading is essential. :thumb:

Longer intake runners coupled with smaller intake ports increase air velocity and cylinder filling. For quick spooling, low airflow turbo's, the 2g manifold and head is considered a better option than 1g/Evo3/SM intake manifolds on a 1g head.
 
The 1st gen heads have larger intake ports which gives the advantage to the 1st gen head. Stock v stock the 1st gens will out flow the 2nd gens. Port out the 2nd gen heads and you have basically the same thing. The volocity and how fast which ever will fill a cylinder is still speculation. You have a evo 3 intake mani op, you have bragging rights, and a lil extra added performance over the stock 2g mani, but I don't think it's going to be alot.
 
Look for the 20+ page thread on the Evo 3 intake manifold and you'll have the answers you're looking for. Long story short it's a upgrade over the stock 2G manifold and you'll be a fool not to install it. I'm almost done installing mine along with a larger TB, cams, and valve springs.

I'd think Mitsubishi would put an intake manifold that match the Evo 3 16g.
 
Look for the 20+ page thread on the Evo 3 intake manifold and you'll have the answers you're looking for.

^^^ This. In fact here is the thread for you. http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/bolt-tech/245603-lancer-evolution-iii-intake-manifold.html

I have been running a evo3 IM for a few years now and I love it. It did make a difference in how my car performs vs the stock 2g manifold and there are MANY people out there that agree. I have still yet to hear of someone switching back to the stock 2g IM because they were unhappy with the evo3 IM. That should speak for itself.
 
Look for the 20+ page thread on the Evo 3 intake manifold and you'll have the answers you're looking for. Long story short it's a upgrade over the stock 2G manifold and you'll be a fool not to install it. I'm almost done installing mine along with a larger TB, cams, and valve springs.

I'd think Mitsubishi would put an intake manifold that match the Evo 3 16g.

EXACTLY :hellyeah:
 
Just my opinion on intake manifold is all. If his turbo setup is rather stock from his profile not very well stated its not going to be a big improvement imo. Im not a hp penny pincher so I guess it must be good then. ^_^
But I doubt the 2g intake manifold is bad, just a wasteful thing to swap out imo.
 
Just my opinion on intake manifold is all. If his turbo setup is rather stock from his profile not very well stated its not going to be a big improvement imo. Im not a hp penny pincher so I guess it must be good then. ^_^
But I doubt the 2g intake manifold is bad, just a wasteful thing to swap out imo.

No one cares about your "opinion" (especially since you don't seem to have any personal experience on the matter) we care about real world proven results and first hand experience.
 
Well going by his mod list he still is on a T25 so clipto is right. That turbo will fall on its face to make upgrading to a EVO3 intake worthless. Now if the op is going to upgrade to a larger turbo then the manifold will definitely help.
 
Sorry not trying to be rude or an a$$. The evo3 manifold will give him more mid-top end pull without sacraficing any mid-low end power. We all know that factory cars in Europe outperform their American counterparts in terms of HP. They dont need to worry about the restrictive emissions BS that we do. It makes sense to use parts from them that are an improvement over our stock parts and yet still retain a stock apperence. I can tell you from experience what my 16g used to fall on its face after 5500 RPM's with the stock 2g manifold. With the evo3 IM it now pulls rather well all the way to redline (7200).
 
Longer intake runners coupled with smaller intake ports increase air velocity and cylinder filling. For quick spooling, low airflow turbo's, the 2g manifold and head is considered a better option than 1g/Evo3/SM intake manifolds on a 1g head.

Your mistaken, the evo 3 intake has smaller ports just like the 2g. Bolts right up to a 2g head with no porting needed. It has the smaller ports and shorter runners for more air velocity.
 
Some evo 3 mani don't come with the coils, bracket and or power transistor which will make the swap a little more challenging. If you have these than it's just like bolting on the 2g manifold. When I bolted on my evo 3 manifold I had to completely redo my tuning because of how much it changes the motor's VE. The funny thing that I wasn't expecting was most of my retuning was needed in the off boost loads. I just needed to make minor change in boost (a little more fuel up top).
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top