jibberishballr
15+ Year Contributor
- 475
- 3
- Aug 23, 2005
-
Chico,
California
The good? The bad? Which one gets more airflow? If so why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
MyBeatGSX said:Mushrooms are foam and flow a gazillion times more air, but also have pretty poor filtering.
Cones are usually cotton gauze and don't flow as well but filter much better.
I'm sure the power difference is miniscule, I wouldn't run a mushroom on a daily driver that sees dusty dirty conditions.
Whatever you get, stay far far away from anything requiring oil (i.e. K&N).
I get the difference, thanks for clearing that up, but I own a K&N, and wouldnt tell anyone to not buy them, I happen to like my K&N very much
. 
Staytuned said:I never soak my filter to death, I coat it with enough to make it pink. I have never found oil any further down my intake pipe than the filter.
MyBeatGSX said:The fact that they charge $150 for a filter and MAF adapter should show what rip offs they are.
.MyBeatGSX said:Where do think all that oil goes? Would you rather breathe through a dry face mask or one that was oil soaked. The oil dirties the MAF, compressor, and intercooler over time.
Although its very expensive (~$120), I'd suggest going with the APEXi Power Intake filter, its a cone with a velocity stack inlet and its a dry type.
! there's an AEM filter in here, sorry... no can do" MyBeatGSX said:...I wouldn't run a mushroom on a daily driver that sees dusty dirty conditions....