The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

compression test results and questions

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

slider85

15+ Year Contributor
469
1
May 21, 2004
Langley,
ok. from tranny to tbelt:
178, 181, 178, 178
also did a leak down test and the results were basically the same. not sure if I used enough oil though. 2-3ml, is that enough? the book said to only add a couple of drops.
Question. How much does carbon on the pistons effect the results? those are good numbers for a 93, right?
 
Those actually look vey good. It's when you start having 150 or less that you should be pretty worried. Unfortunately, my 90 N/T numbers didn't come back so good, in the same order as you : 180, 145, 60, 105 :thumbdown And the DSMs never fail.... to keep taking my money :mad:
 
slider85 said:
ok. from tranny to tbelt:
178, 181, 178, 178
That's fine.
also did a leak down test and the results were basically the same.
You didn't need to.
not sure if I used enough oil though. 2-3ml, is that enough? the book said to only add a couple of drops.
About a half-teaspoon.
Question. How much does carbon on the pistons effect the results?
With modern gas formulations, very little carbon accumulates. You could run some water through it to clean whatever's in there out.
those are good numbers for a 93, right?
What is it you're neurotic about? The cylinders are fine.
 
slider85 said:
your car is newer and probably better built. :shhh:

nope shes got almost 100,000 on her only things been rebuilt is the tranny :D, i drive her like an animal too :p

[edit]
my bad i looked at the odomiter today 104,000 and some change :thumb:
 
Checked mine a few weeks ago the N/t that si and it was 210 220 230 220. I checked it more than once cause I couldn't believe my little 96 NA with 75k miles had that much compression. Oh yeah what do you all think of the miles? pretty low for an 8 yr old car huh? LOL
 
Damn some of you guys have great compression for the miles you have. When I bought my car last year with only 37K on the odo. I checked the compression and it was 161-168-173-175

I'm gonna check it again soon and see how all my modding has effected it.
 
GotSome-Turbo said:
Checked mine a few weeks ago the N/t that si and it was 210 220 230 220. I checked it more than once cause I couldn't believe my little 96 NA with 75k miles had that much compression. Oh yeah what do you all think of the miles? pretty low for an 8 yr old car huh? LOL

that is not to good. you may have some carbon build up that you should get rid of. look for a thread about it, doug gave some good tips to get it out. it wasnt too long ago.

mine is 200-210-200-200 @ 73k miles
 
Immortal should have lower compression b/c he's running a turbo car. I dont know the exact specs of what the 2g turbo car is. but i know that on the 4g63 N/t is suppose to be like approx 192 in all 4 cylinders, thats what the books say
 
pr0 said:
I know but I will only boost like 4 pounds. They aren't 100% shot yet :p It will be in the rebuild after a week or two anyway. Just want to see how it goes :D

you cant run that low of boost.
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top