MNGSX
20+ Year Contributor
- 2,533
- 25
- Mar 30, 2003
-
Bloomington,
Minnesota
Mods...
I know vendors can't start group buys... I'm not a vendor....
Please let me know if all group buys are a no-go.
I'm not even at the buy phase yet.. This is different than a GB discount on something more mainstream like a turbo timer or a Evo 16g or something.
Ok.. Back to buisness.
I am currently seeking price quotes on titanium con rods...
Right now around $465 each is the best price. Crower.. I'm still waiting for returned emails and calls on some other companies.
All the rod shops discount based on how many are ordered.
Average discount per rod/ # ordered to get the discount
$20/8
$30/12
$40/16
They will be 12mm longer than stock for use in the taller decked 4G64 engine with a 4g63 crank.
You can use stocking pistons from some MFG's
A .080 overbore 4g63 stroker piston (87.0mm) fits a 4g64 block at .020 overbore (87.0mm). It's wrist pin is moved closer to the dome by 6mm since a 4g63 has a 6mm lower deck height. Put it in a 2.4 block with a 2.0 crank and you have 12mm more room for rod length and a much lighter and stable piston due to pin placement.
A 87.0mm piston designed for a regular 4g64 weighs around 30-40 grams more than a stroker piston depending on the manufacturer. The stroker pistons wrist pin location makes for a lighter piston...
Titanium wrist pins (JE stocks them) would cut another 30-40 grams depending on what steel pins you compare them to.
Ross can make them... ask swordfish about his pistons. I'm going custom with bore size however Wiseco stocks 87.0mm pistons so lower priced options exist here too.
The idea is to shave as much weight off of everything without sacrificing durablilty or longevity.
Estimates but very very close to actual component weight. Variances between MFG's make it an estimate.
280 grams saved per rod. = 1120 grams
20 grams per piston (conservative could be 40g) = 80 grams to 160grams
40 grams per wrist pin= 160 grams
1360-1440 grams saved.
Some of that is rotating weight and some reciprocating.
I'll need to know big end and piston pin end weights on the rods to figure out how much of the 1120 grams saved is where. The piston and pin weight savings is all reciprocating. I have got some formulas around here... In a nutshell between the piston, wrist pin weight reduction and rod weight and length changes A LOT of parisitic power loss and strain on the rod is eliminated.
It's a bottom end 2.99lbs to 3.17lbs lighter on a long rod motor than a billet steel short rod motor. Now imagine using a knife edged crankshaft. (Bj's shaves about 7lbs off a crank.)
Then there is flywheel reduction lets say ACT. 11.25-19 = 7.75lbs. So the 14.75lbs of rotational mass reduction from the crank and flywheel looks good. It decreases parasitic loss and increases throttle response it does'nt help the engine stay together anywhere near as good as the strong but very light rod and piston assemblies. Cranks and flywheels don't go from zero to max piston speed and back again during a revolution like the pin end of a rod or a piston and pin. You are cutting almost 18lbs of weight off of the moving parts of the engine while increasing strength. Like I said in another thread spending 2x as much to get titanium rods may amount to a completed car that only cost 20% more. Not too bad considering the dramatic gains.
I know vendors can't start group buys... I'm not a vendor....
Please let me know if all group buys are a no-go.
I'm not even at the buy phase yet.. This is different than a GB discount on something more mainstream like a turbo timer or a Evo 16g or something.
Ok.. Back to buisness.
I am currently seeking price quotes on titanium con rods...
Right now around $465 each is the best price. Crower.. I'm still waiting for returned emails and calls on some other companies.
All the rod shops discount based on how many are ordered.
Average discount per rod/ # ordered to get the discount
$20/8
$30/12
$40/16
They will be 12mm longer than stock for use in the taller decked 4G64 engine with a 4g63 crank.
You can use stocking pistons from some MFG's
A .080 overbore 4g63 stroker piston (87.0mm) fits a 4g64 block at .020 overbore (87.0mm). It's wrist pin is moved closer to the dome by 6mm since a 4g63 has a 6mm lower deck height. Put it in a 2.4 block with a 2.0 crank and you have 12mm more room for rod length and a much lighter and stable piston due to pin placement.
A 87.0mm piston designed for a regular 4g64 weighs around 30-40 grams more than a stroker piston depending on the manufacturer. The stroker pistons wrist pin location makes for a lighter piston...
Titanium wrist pins (JE stocks them) would cut another 30-40 grams depending on what steel pins you compare them to.
Ross can make them... ask swordfish about his pistons. I'm going custom with bore size however Wiseco stocks 87.0mm pistons so lower priced options exist here too.
The idea is to shave as much weight off of everything without sacrificing durablilty or longevity.
Estimates but very very close to actual component weight. Variances between MFG's make it an estimate.
280 grams saved per rod. = 1120 grams
20 grams per piston (conservative could be 40g) = 80 grams to 160grams
40 grams per wrist pin= 160 grams
1360-1440 grams saved.
Some of that is rotating weight and some reciprocating.
I'll need to know big end and piston pin end weights on the rods to figure out how much of the 1120 grams saved is where. The piston and pin weight savings is all reciprocating. I have got some formulas around here... In a nutshell between the piston, wrist pin weight reduction and rod weight and length changes A LOT of parisitic power loss and strain on the rod is eliminated.
It's a bottom end 2.99lbs to 3.17lbs lighter on a long rod motor than a billet steel short rod motor. Now imagine using a knife edged crankshaft. (Bj's shaves about 7lbs off a crank.)
Then there is flywheel reduction lets say ACT. 11.25-19 = 7.75lbs. So the 14.75lbs of rotational mass reduction from the crank and flywheel looks good. It decreases parasitic loss and increases throttle response it does'nt help the engine stay together anywhere near as good as the strong but very light rod and piston assemblies. Cranks and flywheels don't go from zero to max piston speed and back again during a revolution like the pin end of a rod or a piston and pin. You are cutting almost 18lbs of weight off of the moving parts of the engine while increasing strength. Like I said in another thread spending 2x as much to get titanium rods may amount to a completed car that only cost 20% more. Not too bad considering the dramatic gains.
. BTW, I was taking the optimistic approach when I said $800. $1200+/- would be do-able next fall. Keep us posted, even if they do think we're crazy!
, but I was just wondering how these pistons with pins raised have been holding together. I didn't realize the 2.3 kits used raised pistons. I never looked into them, don't like the idea. But, if thats the case my questions have been answered.