bOOstd GSX
20+ Year Contributor
- 931
- 0
- Nov 29, 2003
-
Plum,
Pennsylvania
Let's get this settled once and for all. Vote for which 2G Eclipse is better and why, 2GA or 2GB. Just for the records, I vote for the 2GB. Duh.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

, agreed.:laugh:
Originally posted by L2RTSiAWD
I voted for 2GB and I have a 2GA.
:thumbdown with the smiley face bumper :laugh:
) And 2GB's are less prone to become a crankwalk victim. 
Originally posted by 14.5 drift
I believe the 99 models had the crank walk issue's resolved

Originally posted by guedo512
is this true![]()

It is no secret. The bearings weren't built to specs, and in some cases they were built so poorly the crank then begins to move. Mitsubishi has a special program out, if your crank begins to walk, where they make special bearings to fitted to your motor.Originally posted by paranoidTSi
I have a EARLY 95 model, 109K and looking at its history it has had no crankwalk issues.
If 99s really resolved the crankwalk issue, I think we'd know what is causing it. So far I think the "oil squirter" theory works best.
It's like...everytime my car breaks... I look over at it, and it's like it's laughing at me. I'm keeping the 2ga rear, actually I just picked up another matching one on ebay for 20bucks. But I'm gonna get a 2gb front.Originally posted by L2RTSiAWD
I voted for 2GB and I have a 2GA.
:thumbdown with the smiley face bumper :laugh: