The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

stroker piston pin height

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

mountaineerjeff

10+ Year Contributor
127
0
Nov 5, 2008
Morgantown, West Virginia
so Ive been told to be leery of using stroker pistons, because of the pin being moved into the oil ring land. any ill effects of this?
 
The oil ring only controls the amount of oil film on the cylinder walls, it does not hold combustion pressure whatsoever. There aren't any real substantial drawbacks to using a shorter compression height piston with a longer stroke or rod (or both). If the piston skirt is also short and the piston is made of a material that requires a large PTW clearance to account for thermal expansion, there may be more piston slap and irregular cylinder wear. Shortening the compression height of a piston does inherently weaken its design by a very small amount, but it saves weight and therefore reduces tensile stress on rods and rod fasteners.
 
ok, unfortunatly i dont have alot of info on the other side of this argument, but I have definitely been told that there are drawbacks to moving the pin height upward. this would be used on a long rod motor, so that should take care of piston slap and horizontal wear associated with strokers correct? Im just looking at building a motor that will last a long time. and i dont want a problem that arose simply because I decided to move or not move the piston height
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top