Aproductions
10+ Year Contributor
- 2,123
- 50
- Aug 11, 2009
-
Allentown,
Pennsylvania
I need a timing kit, headgasket and evo 9 specs for the evo springs and retainers installed in a 2g.
I posted this to maybe get some help with these 3.
timing kit- 2 oem pulleys and tensioner and a gates belt.
headgasket- waiting on machine work to figure out what thickness ( I have 9:1 pistons so if I wanted to lower the comp a little, what thickness would be safe)? I don't wanna go too thick.
specs for evo 9 springs and retainers- I found this but can't verify it. basically what numbers do I give the machinist?
this is what I found
"
Some general data used in the test to "standardize" the results a bit.
Installed height general numbers (1.560) for comparison; this includes the mitsu locator given at an average value of 40.
.410 will be used for cam lift.
As follows;
DSM
Coil Bind
1.115
60
1.175 SAFE
1.560 = 68lbs
.030
1.530 = 72lbs
.410 LIFT
1.120 = 192lbs
But we're under where we need to be. When performing this last squeeze there was no daylight left. ABORT ABORT! DSM spring is KO'd. Even if we pull the shim its still over.
EVO
Coil Bind
1.035
60
1.095 SAFE
Installed height general numbers (1.560) for comparison; this includes the mitsu locator given at an average value of 40.
1.560 = 65lbs
.030 shim
1.530 = 72lbs
.410 will be used to simulate cam lift
1.120 = 154lbs
In referance to our original coil bind number, we can see we still have room on the Evo spring. Showing the benefits of the semi-beehive springs and its much looser coils. It would take a 60 thou shim to max this scenario out.
weight
DSM
Spring: 56.3g
Retainer: 13.7g
Evo
Spring: 39g
Retainer: 3.9g "
so any help would be very helpful.
I posted this to maybe get some help with these 3.
timing kit- 2 oem pulleys and tensioner and a gates belt.
headgasket- waiting on machine work to figure out what thickness ( I have 9:1 pistons so if I wanted to lower the comp a little, what thickness would be safe)? I don't wanna go too thick.
specs for evo 9 springs and retainers- I found this but can't verify it. basically what numbers do I give the machinist?
this is what I found
"
Some general data used in the test to "standardize" the results a bit.
Installed height general numbers (1.560) for comparison; this includes the mitsu locator given at an average value of 40.
.410 will be used for cam lift.
As follows;
DSM
Coil Bind
1.115
60
1.175 SAFE
1.560 = 68lbs
.030
1.530 = 72lbs
.410 LIFT
1.120 = 192lbs
But we're under where we need to be. When performing this last squeeze there was no daylight left. ABORT ABORT! DSM spring is KO'd. Even if we pull the shim its still over.
EVO
Coil Bind
1.035
60
1.095 SAFE
Installed height general numbers (1.560) for comparison; this includes the mitsu locator given at an average value of 40.
1.560 = 65lbs
.030 shim
1.530 = 72lbs
.410 will be used to simulate cam lift
1.120 = 154lbs
In referance to our original coil bind number, we can see we still have room on the Evo spring. Showing the benefits of the semi-beehive springs and its much looser coils. It would take a 60 thou shim to max this scenario out.
weight
DSM
Spring: 56.3g
Retainer: 13.7g
Evo
Spring: 39g
Retainer: 3.9g "
so any help would be very helpful.
. I mean the shop could check and double check spring height, installed height, and all the movement of the valves in ralation, but its just for a safety measure.