NickF509
10+ Year Contributor
- 94
- 0
- Aug 23, 2011
-
Yakima,
Washington
There are always posts on retarding timing when knock or advancing timing when under WOT etc. Because of this i was wondering what the heck this is actually doing. There are a couple of good sites on ignition timing but i'm not sure I understand fully what is happening.
From my understanding timing is basically the concept of igniting the fuel air mixture at exactly the right time to make the most efficient use of the fuel. Igniting the mixture at the timing of 0 would be saying that the spark happens exactly when the piston is compressed to the fullest extent. However from what I have read this is not desirable for power because at 0 the piston is already starting into the downward motion of the powerstroke and is not truly compressed to the greatest extent anymore.
So advancing timing would be to say that the spark would fire earlier into the compression stroke. It would make sense that timing would need to advance to a higher degree the faster the car goes because the piston is moving quicker so the spark would need to happen earlier to try and get the piston at the very best compression point. If timing never advanced and the spark always happened at 0 but the piston moved faster then it would really be firing far into the power stroke and have very little compression.
So retarding timing is forcing the spark to fire into the powerstroke, reducing compression and causing less power.
Am i correct?
From my understanding timing is basically the concept of igniting the fuel air mixture at exactly the right time to make the most efficient use of the fuel. Igniting the mixture at the timing of 0 would be saying that the spark happens exactly when the piston is compressed to the fullest extent. However from what I have read this is not desirable for power because at 0 the piston is already starting into the downward motion of the powerstroke and is not truly compressed to the greatest extent anymore.
So advancing timing would be to say that the spark would fire earlier into the compression stroke. It would make sense that timing would need to advance to a higher degree the faster the car goes because the piston is moving quicker so the spark would need to happen earlier to try and get the piston at the very best compression point. If timing never advanced and the spark always happened at 0 but the piston moved faster then it would really be firing far into the power stroke and have very little compression.
So retarding timing is forcing the spark to fire into the powerstroke, reducing compression and causing less power.
Am i correct?