Front end conversions ?????

[KRAZYKOREAN]

here you go dsmed...you feel better now...I did the whole shabang bumpers headlights and taillights and even side skirts

 

[KRAZYKOREAN]

ass shot

 

[Black95TSIawd]

i still cant believe u sold it after u just about finished it and didnt even tune it yet

 

[KRAZYKOREAN]

Originally posted by Black95TSIawd
i still cant believe u sold it after u just about finished it and didnt even tune it yet

Ehh it happens....Just soemthing about the talon I didnt want anymore..

 

[Black95TSIawd]

you should have at least waited to get the feature photo

 

[InfamousEclipse]

to each his own, I prefer 95-96 Reverse lights, I like the curve conformation to the rear body lines

a lot of people probably do 97-99 front for performance gains of a larger oppening for a FMIC, i.e. AirPoppoff

 

[KRAZYKOREAN]

Originally posted by Black95TSIawd
you should have at least waited to get the feature photo

Yeah right like mine would have been picked ever...

 

[Defiant]

Originally posted by KRAZYKOREAN
here you go dsmed...you feel better now...I did the whole shabang bumpers headlights and taillights and even side skirts

It ain't complete if you don't paint the roof white.

The Last Stock Talon:

 

[Jeremy-2G]

 

[Rice Over Wheat]

Originally posted by Dsmed
Why in the world do all these people do front end conversions to turn their 95-96 DSM's into 97+? I am a big fan of "if you start a project, you better finish it and finish it correctly" Why not go on and do the rear end too? Too damn lazy thats why. Who do you think you are fooling by doing the front end conversion when you still are rocking those ugly back up lights placed next to the license plate. Or is everyone that does a front end conversion prejudice of the round reverse lights in the bumpers?

Personally, I don't understand why anyone would bother spending time and money to "convert" a 95-96 body style to another stock year just so they can look like a Hertz rental. I think you people do it because you want to look like you're driving a newer model year without paying the price.

About the rears...95-96 is FAR superior to the Pikachu/Pokemon dimpled ass of a 97-99. Those reverse lights belong on a Neon. Notice no other car manufacturer has built a car with similar ass dimples...why? Because they look g-a-y.

Mits got it right with the 2G debut. After that, the ricer scene apparently influenced the designers' minds so for the 97 revision they added the wannabe supra midwing that every honda riceboy had on his prelude/civic at the time, as well as changed the front end to that factory ricer grill that looks rediculous with the factory fogs and no FMIC.

ROW

 

[Rice Over Wheat]

Originally posted by InfamousEclipse
a lot of people probably do 97-99 front for performance gains of a larger oppening for a FMIC, i.e. AirPoppoff

True, that's a good reason. The 97-99 needs a FMIC to look correct. I do prefer the headlights on the 97-99 years.

ROW

 

[greyforestgst]

Originally posted by Rice Over Wheat
Personally, I don't understand why anyone would bother spending time and money to "convert" a 95-96 body style to another stock year just so they can look like a Hertz rental. I think you people do it because you want to look like you're driving a newer model year without paying the price.

About the rears...95-96 is FAR superior to the Pikachu/Pokemon dimpled ass of a 97-99. Those reverse lights belong on a Neon. Notice no other car manufacturer has built a car with similar ass dimples...why? Because they look g-a-y.

Mits got it right with the 2G debut. After that, the ricer scene apparently influenced the designers' minds so for the 97 revision they added the wannabe supra midwing that every honda riceboy had on his prelude/civic at the time, as well as changed the front end to that factory ricer grill that looks rediculous with the factory fogs and no FMIC.

ROW

i like my 2ga ass, but my 2ga front is goofy lookin. the 2gb front is MUCH better shaped for air to enter my intercooler.

 

[RedTurboEclipse]

Originally posted by Rice Over Wheat
Personally, I don't understand why anyone would bother spending time and money to "convert" a 95-96 body style to another stock year just so they can look like a Hertz rental. I think you people do it because you want to look like you're driving a newer model year without paying the price.

About the rears...95-96 is FAR superior to the Pikachu/Pokemon dimpled ass of a 97-99. Those reverse lights belong on a Neon. Notice no other car manufacturer has built a car with similar ass dimples...why? Because they look g-a-y.

Mits got it right with the 2G debut. After that, the ricer scene apparently influenced the designers' minds so for the 97 revision they added the wannabe supra midwing that every honda riceboy had on his prelude/civic at the time, as well as changed the front end to that factory ricer grill that looks rediculous with the factory fogs and no FMIC.

ROW

u wanna know why..

because this..

You must be logged in to view this image or video.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.

looks better than this

You must be logged in to view this image or video.

and yes.. those are teh same cars.. not to mention i use to have a 98 GS-T.. if there was a need for qualifications on why to do the conversion which u make it seem by ur reply.. i think i high qualify.. ur opinion is ur opinion.. but i go with what the public says.. and public says.. they love the 97-99 look.. and u see all the praised cars are just that.. coincidence? i think not.. 97-99 > 95-96 looks.. make a poll even.. dont hate playa..

 

[fireredGST]

That retarding looking fake-ass supra spoiler has to go playa Who gives a shit what other people say, be orginal, that is why its your car, not the publics. 95-96 Owns the 97-99...EXAMPLE #1

 

[RedTurboEclipse]

that pic makes me realize why im glad i did the 97-99 conversion.. i love the look.. i lvoed it on my 98 gs-t.. and il ove it now on the gsx.. not cause of what people say.. but more like cause it looks better.. i mentioned the public because its a fact that a majority favors the 97-99 look.. and who can blame us.. it DOES look better..

 

[fireredGST]

Originally posted by RedTurboEclipse
that pic makes me realize why im glad i did the 97-99 conversion.. i love the look.. i lvoed it on my 98 gs-t.. and il ove it now on the gsx.. not cause of what people say.. but more like cause it looks better.. i mentioned the public because its a fact that a majority favors the 97-99 look.. and who can blame us.. it DOES look better..

Sure it does.... The only thing everyone thinks is hot is the front bumper, the rear bumper with the dimples is butt ugly as well as the ### ass wing. You should have kept the low wing , they look 100 times better. And red cars look alot hotter than black cars anyways....

To each his own, I perfer the 95-96 look and alot of others do as well


By the way try to spell LOVED right next time.

 

[KRAZYKOREAN]

yeah awesome great.. who cares if people dont like...cuz I dont like yours

 

[markGSX]

Gene, your car looks badass. Far better looking than any 95-96... even better than any 97+ I've seen!

 

[xxrealmsxx]

it's YOUR car, F*ck what everyone else thinks, personally i like the 95 rear and and a 97+ front, and i have a 97gst. some dont like it, but F*ck em, just F*ck em.

 

[Rice Over Wheat]

Originally posted by RedTurboEclipse
and yes.. those are teh same cars.. not to mention i use to have a 98 GS-T.. if there was a need for qualifications on why to do the conversion which u make it seem by ur reply.. i think i high qualify.. ur opinion is ur opinion.. but i go with what the public says.. and public says.. they love the 97-99 look.. and u see all the praised cars are just that.. coincidence? i think not.. 97-99 > 95-96 looks.. make a poll even.. dont hate playa

Ah, such an eloquently presented post requires a response catering to your dialect. Allow me:

Sweet ebonics dawg! Look yo, can I roll with yo flava?

Yo prob in't the 9-to-da-5 and 6 model years doh cat, it be da wack ass blitz knock-off kit yo be flauntin foo! It izzin no diffen then wipin yo ass crack clean afta a good shit, ya herrrd me? F'sho! An da public, what da fuk does joe m'f'n public gots to say about what wheels to represent to yo peoples G? Yo...3Gs be like crack rocks in the projects at a swap meet sale, buts theys wack too! Yo needs to check yo self be'fo yo wreck yo self foo! Fa shizzle!

Peace out to da tru playas ya herrrd!

ROW

 

[jp171]

I think they both look good, but then again, I have a 1991 Laser non-turbo front bumper on my TSi AWD, and I love the look. Not to mention it force-feeds air to my stock side-mount.

To each his own.

 

[fireredGST]

Originally posted by KRAZYKOREAN
yeah awesome great.. who cares if people dont like...cuz I dont like yours

Like I give a shit, next time buy an eclipse, don't try to make a fake-ass copy

 

[eclipsed95]

I did the whole conversion

 

[stock1g4g63]

.... because they want to....

 

[L2RTSiAWD]

Damn, some people cannot go 2 seconds without bashing on someone else's stuff.