The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Dyno pull (inspired by Larry)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Originally posted by RabidDonkeyBoy
just saying what i see, i see what appears to be 4 cores welded up in a ghetto FMIC

6587eclipsefmic-med.jpg

If you are so bright, why don't you look at the picture of the intercooler with the front bumper off....you might be enlightned then, Intercooler expert!

Look real hard before you show your intelligence
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
Originally posted by turbotalon92


If you are so bright, why don't you look at the picture of the intercooler with the front bumper off....you might be enlightned then, Intercooler expert!

Look real hard before you show your intelligence

i don't care what its made out of its beautiful OMG

and even if it was 4 sidemounts who cares since it obviously gets done.
 
Originally posted by mavisky


i don't care what its made out of its beautiful OMG

and even if it was 4 sidemounts who cares since it obviously gets done.

Thanks Mavisky, my point exactly.
 
Originally posted by turbotalon92


Thanks Mavisky, my point exactly.

no prob, plus i'm ghetto rigging up 3 sidemounts for my 16g'ed ride. but so is life when modding while going to school.
 
Originally posted by mavisky


no prob, plus i'm ghetto rigging up 3 sidemounts for my 16g'ed ride. but so is life when modding while going to school.

I had a 92 talon AWD with three 2g cores as a t/b. It worked great. If you would like, I can send you a pic of it when I get back to my dorm room.
 
yea that'd be nice. give me some ideas for pipe routing, mounting, and endtank construction.
 
Nice car and numbers. Your car is kick a$$! Now I noticed on your dyno sheet it is measured in STD. I know on my dyno run when I measure in STD I get 318whp but on SAE I only get 303whp. Which measurement should I be using? Again sweet ride and sweet IC too;) .
 
Originally posted by GSTwkd
Nice car and numbers. Your car is kick a$$! Now I noticed on your dyno sheet it is measured in STD. I know on my dyno run when I measure in STD I get 318whp but on SAE I only get 303whp. Which measurement should I be using? Again sweet ride and sweet IC too;) .

Not sure of the difference. That would be for someone who runs dynos.

thanks for the compliments though,
Chris
 
Originally posted by GSTwkd
Now I noticed on your dyno sheet it is measured in STD. I know on my dyno run when I measure in STD I get 318whp but on SAE I only get 303whp. Which measurement should I be using?

The numbers are really only relative when used for comparison and improving HP when tuning. If you dyno'd last month and they were shown in STD, then this month you went back to tune some new parts, you would want the figures in the same measurment.
Most numbers you will see are SAE corrected though, in magazines and what not.
 
ILOSE---"The numbers are really only relative when used for comparison and improving HP when tuning. If you dyno'd last month and they were shown in STD, then this month you went back to tune some new parts, you would want the figures in the same measurment.
Most numbers you will see are SAE corrected though, in magazines and what not."

Yea but I would rather show people the STD:D

turbotalon92-- Nice to see a fellow GST in the 11's. You rock! Hell, I'd be happy to see 13's again with my rolling 18's now. With the t25 on 16's I ran 13.9@100, now I get 14.0's@106 spinning my 18's:| . What are you trapping at?
 
Originally posted by GSTwkd
ILOSE---"The numbers are really only relative when used for comparison and improving HP when tuning. If you dyno'd last month and they were shown in STD, then this month you went back to tune some new parts, you would want the figures in the same measurment.
Most numbers you will see are SAE corrected though, in magazines and what not."

Yea but I would rather show people the STD:D

turbotalon92-- Nice to see a fellow GST in the 11's. You rock! Hell, I'd be happy to see 13's again with my rolling 18's now. With the t25 on 16's I ran 13.9@100, now I get 14.0's@106 spinning my 18's:| . What are you trapping at?

Trapped at 122mph on the 11.9 run. You can check the time slip in my gallery:

http://www.dsmtuners.com/gallery/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=6587&thumb=1
 
Originally posted by turbotalon92
Can anybody recomend a good A/F ratio. On the last run, I was @11:1, is that way off?

Chris

11:1 is a bit on the rich side, but safe for pump gas. Try and tune for 12.5:1 on C-16, you should gain some big power. Oh yeah a logger is a MUST, you need to see your knock sums. The LED mod is almost useless.
 
On a sidenote, you guys think I can reach 400 hp with my turbo? I think my stock cams and unported head will hold me back. 400 whp is pretty much my goal. BTW nice numbers!!
 
Originally posted by TSi92
On a sidenote, you guys think I can reach 400 hp with my turbo? I think my stock cams and unported head will hold me back. 400 whp is pretty much my goal. BTW nice numbers!!

I think this is getting to the hijacking point. But a super 20G should support 400hp all other things being considered.

AFR. I agree I'd shoot for at least a 12.1 to C-16. I'd decrease the boost down to about 23 psi and lean out the mixture and I think you'd come out with some similar numbers if not slightly better. I don't exactly remember what you have in that shortblock so I am not sure what psi you intend to run on a regular basis? But even if you keep the boost up there, all the better!
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top