dsmlink v3?

[motomattxxx]

^^^ That would be the mdp. Manifold differential pressure sensor, for checking egr operation.

 

[dwdsm]

Okay then what is the lillte black box on the top ove the Intake manifold on the 2G's

It's the MDP sensor. Here This will explain it all.
http://members.shaw.ca/dsm.1000q/Engineprimer/2G/mdp.htm

 

[Rice Over Wheat]

And here's where you can buy the MAP kit.

http://www.dsmparts.com/customer/product.php?productid=340&cat=113&page=1

 

[DSMunknown]

http://dsmtuners.com/forums/showthread.php?t=235400

 

[gsx rated98]

The onlything garantee we have right now about V3, is that its being developed, and its going to be a great improvement on an already awsome (IMO) product.

Other then that, what ever you read is a guess. If it doesnt come from Tom or Dave, i dont believe it, and neither should you.

 

[hopwoodp]

First page of the Major Enhancements thread bullet point #10 under "As Definite as you can Get" section

I'm most interested in getting additional external inputs as continually swapping BTW MAP and WBO2 on my one input (EGR-T) got old along time ago

You are dead on! I must of just totally missed that one. Thanks. For everyone else here is the link: http://www.dsmlink.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2037&page=1&highlight=major+enhancement

 

[Rice Over Wheat]

GM MAF support is being developed, per Tom's thread on dsmlink forums, and thats a fact.

 

[xXaTaXx]

Maybe some support on the later models, like mine?
...unless i'm again behind in the times and i'm already supported by dsmlink. ;X

 

[scottsee]

Maybe some support on the later models, like mine?
...unless i'm again behind in the times and i'm already supported by dsmlink. ;X

Behind the times sir..

 

[BGRIPTP]

Now will V3 cost more to buy from scratch then V2? I am kind of waiting for V3 because if I get V2 I will need to spend 200 bucks on a MAFT.

 

[vintagemuscle]

Now will V3 cost more to buy from scratch then V2? I am kind of waiting for V3 because if I get V2 I will need to spend 200 bucks on a MAFT.

Why? What's wrong with your 2g mas? Don't forget when using the maft setup with V2 your going to want to have a WBo2 or map sensor to calibrate it correctly.

 

[larsrya8]

Now will V3 cost more to buy from scratch then V2? I am kind of waiting for V3 because if I get V2 I will need to spend 200 bucks on a MAFT.

If you're overflowing the 2G MAF, DSMLink provides you some way to get around that.

Don't forget when using the maft setup with V2 your going to want to have a WBo2 or map sensor to calibrate it correctly.

You'd want that anyway. DSMLink gives you more a more precise way to calibrate airflow.

 

[scottsee]

For most people a GM MAF is a down grade from the stock 2g maf. Personally I think the older MAFT generation translators are the worst tuning product on the market for a DSM.

 

[RipperXX]

Well I know I purchased a MAFT before the DSMLink. And I never intended it use it to "tune" it was mostly so I could set it up in a blow through style. The MAFT does flow better after all.

The MAFT in conjuction with the DSMLink though is pretty good IMHO.

 

[scottsee]

Well I know I purchased a MAFT before the DSMLink. And I never intended it use it to "tune" it was mostly so I could set it up in a blow through style. The MAFT does flow better after all.

The MAFT in conjuction with the DSMLink though is pretty good IMHO.

It flows less restrictively, and has the ability to read airflow into the 3400hz range before needing to be clamped though dsmlink (apposed to the 2700hz range of the 2g maf). I definitly wouldn't say it flows "better" then the 2g maf becasue it does require a good bit of calibration. I'm a little off topic here with my point, I agree with you that the MAFT/Dsmlink combo is nice, but without Dsmink I think its a POS.

 

[GVR4592]

With V3 it won't require extra calibration, that's the whole point of eliminating the translator.

 

[scottsee]

I doubt they will get it perfect, but I will be nice to get rid of the translator.

 

[GVR4592]

I doubt they will get it perfect, but I will be nice to get rid of the translator.

I'm sure they won't have any trouble getting it perfect, it's a pretty simple procedure. I'm really surprised the translator wasn't able to get it right.

 

[92DSMErdrick]

How will the GM Maf be connected without the translator? Will the wires have to be spliced, or will you still have the Translator hooked up but bypassed by dsmlink? I don't have dsmlink yet, but i'm looking into getting it in a few months.

 

[GVR4592]

They are looking into making a plug and play cable to go from the Gm maf to the factory mitsubishi maf connector.

 

[PRESSURIZED]

I'm sure they won't have any trouble getting it perfect, it's a pretty simple procedure. I'm really surprised the translator wasn't able to get it right.

It's never going to be perfect. Every GM MAF is different. Some vary by a large percentage.

You are still going to have to use a 3bar/5bar map sensor and adjust the airflow tables to get it dead on., but at least you wont need that translator box

 

[PRESSURIZED]

It flows less restrictively, and has the ability to read airflow into the 3400hz range before needing to be clamped though dsmlink (apposed to the 2700hz range of the 2g maf). I definitly wouldn't say it flows "better" then the 2g maf becasue it does require a good bit of calibration. I'm a little off topic here with my point, I agree with you that the MAFT/Dsmlink combo is nice, but without Dsmink I think its a POS.

The stock 2G maf can definitely read over 2700hz..where did you get that from?. I have numerous logs going into the 3000hz range. Stock UNHACKED 2G maf. Trapping over 125mph in the 1/4 with dsmlink, stock mas.

I would wire in a EVO mas, before I put in those GM mafs. Evo MAS can read over 60/lb min

 

[scottsee]

The stock 2G maf can definitely read over 2700hz..where did you get that from?. I have numerous logs going into the 3000hz range. Stock UNHACKED 2G maf. Trapping over 125mph in the 1/4 with dsmlink, stock mas.

I would wire in a EVO mas, before I put in those GM mafs. Evo MAS can read over 60/lb min

Yes it will definitly flow more then that, it just wont count it. 2700hz is the limitation of the Stock 2g MAF.
I agree the EVO MAF > GM MAF

 

[GVR4592]

It's never going to be perfect. Every GM MAF is different. Some vary by a large percentage.

You are still going to have to use a 3bar/5bar map sensor and adjust the airflow tables to get it dead on., but at least you wont need that translator box

I wonder how Gm was able to do it?

 

[Steve93Talon]

I wonder how Gm was able to do it?

Actually, it's a pretty big problem in the GM tuning world. Closed loop, the cars will self-adjust for the most part, but I know some LS1 guys who see huge variances in WOT AFRs and swapping to an identical MAF from another car will sometimes greatly affect their readings.