jking29
15+ Year Contributor
- 656
- 5
- Jun 7, 2005
-
Huntsville,
Ohio
^^^Nope, that is a Dodge Daytona. The Superbird was made by Plymouth and was based on a Roadrunner body. The Daytona was based on a Charger body.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
To hear the name tossed onto another vehicle boils the blood of some of us who've been around a while.
This, and only this is a Dodge Daytona. It's not an import, it's not a trim level on a goddamned pickup, it was only this. To hear the name tossed onto another vehicle boils the blood of some of us who've been around a while.
And this kind of crap is why some of us would not only allow Detroit's (and, many other) makers to sink into the swamp, but would be jumping up-and-down on the roof until out feet got wet. Think up some new names, you lazy, worthless sacks of shit.
I can't believe it just now dawned on me but, holy crap, is this where park bench wings came from?
Not even close, they are based on the Chrysler EEK platform. Aka the K car platform (think plymouth reliant), the only thing they share in common with any Mitsubishi is that latter models use a SOHC version of the 6G72 that puts out 141hp. They also can have 2.2 or 2.5 liter 4 cylinder engines based on the Chysler slant 6 ranging from 93hp to 224hp in the 2.2 Turbo III engine. While most are slow as shit, certain models like the Shelby Z, the Pacifica, the ES, and the R/T (especially the R/T) have the potential to be extremely fast.
. I didnt see anything after the first 3 replys though. Guess I wasnt on much?What about the Omni GLH? I remember them as kinda being a sleeper.
You need to do a little more reading. That wing is fully functional. It is that high so that the trunk could be opened and that wing generated either 200 lbs or 500 lbs of downforce when it would hit top speeds.
It was a joke. I'm aware of what the wing does, the testing they did in the lockheed wind tunnels, the scaled down cars and all of that, but thanks for the history lesson![]()
Either way, that wing and front bumper made that car ugly as sin.
I can't believe it just now dawned on me but, holy crap, is this where park bench wings came from?
It was a joke. I'm aware of what the wing does, the testing they did in the lockheed wind tunnels, the scaled down cars and all of that, but thanks for the history lesson![]()
Either way, that wing and front bumper made that car ugly as sin.
To each his own, I absolutely love the looks of the original daytona's. The nose and wing are fully functional for aerodynamic purposes. Comparing that to a park bench wing is just plain insulting.
