The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

coupler vs. v-band

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

I don't know if I would go with v-band clamps for an intercooler setup. I don't believe v-bands allow much flex. If you want clamps, look at AdelWiggins clamps. There is another brand, but the name isn't coming to me right now. Maybe if my brother sees this thread, he'll post it up.

Accufab is the other brand. From what I've read online, people seem to like Accufab more than Adel Wiggins. Hella expensive and hella cool.
Throttle Bodies

I've also seen these, which say they're specifically for intercooler piping. Only available in 3" though.
V-Band Intercooler Interconnects Z10 Motorsports
 
Vband is a needless expense for a car with less than 30psi. Tbolt clamps and a bead/ridge on the piping is all that's neccesary for a solid consistant seal that will flex when needed.

How big is the current IC? Get a big side exit one. There will be much less pressure drop, and work well.
 
Clamps and rolled lips on the pipes work fine. Just make sure you use t-bolt clamps. The worm ones won't hold (been there done that as a quick fix <- didn't stay fixed). I couldn't justify the cost for v-bands without running boost so high as to pop a coupler every week.
 
Vband is a needless expense for a car with less than 30psi. Tbolt clamps and a bead/ridge on the piping is all that's neccesary for a solid consistant seal that will flex when needed.


He speaks the truth! :thumb: Completely unnecessary on a "low" boost car, save the vbands for the guys with the 3" turbo outlets. Unless you're rich of course, then go for it BUT like dsm-onster said, you'll have to include a flex point. I've done 23psi on tbolts and silicone and have never had a hose blow off. Haven't gotten around to beading my pipes yet either. :shhh:
 
yeah well since its gonna be a custom job done by my friend i dont really have a budget on it.and i have a friend who has blown a coupler off on a few occasions dont know how tight he had his though so.
 
Vband is a needless expense for a car with less than 30psi. Tbolt clamps and a bead/ridge on the piping is all that's neccesary for a solid consistant seal that will flex when needed.

How big is the current IC? Get a big side exit one. There will be much less pressure drop, and work well.

I agree. I have seen this type of connection withstand 50 psi. Unless you have all solid motor mounts I would allow for a fair amount of flex between the engine and the intercooler.
 
yeah well since its gonna be a custom job done by my friend i dont really have a budget on it.and i have a friend who has blown a coupler off on a few occasions dont know how tight he had his though so.

you could be crafty and use a link bar to limit the flex of the coupler. I used a v-band at the TB and then Hump hose at the Gm-MAS. I did it for easy removal.
 
As mentioned...V-band is an expense that can be spent better until you get into the 30+PSI range. T-bolts and beaded pipe will handle into 30PSI (and really even higher).

But I wouldn't worry about a v-band setup until I was in the mid 30PSI range either.
 
I will be going with all v-bands after I build my engine. BUT, I will be using a water to air intercooler so I don't have to worry about needing any flex. With a fmic I would highly recommend at least one regular coupler for both the lower and upper intercooler pipes. If you use all v-bands, chances are you will crack the intercooler.
 
Clamps and rolled lips on the pipes work fine. Just make sure you use t-bolt clamps. The worm ones won't hold (been there done that as a quick fix <- didn't stay fixed). I couldn't justify the cost for v-bands without running boost so high as to pop a coupler every week.
A spring loaded t-bolt may work better.
Heavy Duty Spring-Loaded T-Bolt Clamps - PartsSystems
Standard Duty Spring Loaded T-Bolt - PartsSystems

They also have constant torque
Constant-Torque Hose Clamp - Heavy-Duty - PartsSystems
Constant-Torque Hose Clamp - PartsSystems
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top