The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

cams or dsmlink

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

eclipsegsx97979

15+ Year Contributor
78
0
Nov 2, 2004
springfield, Massachusetts
what should i do next? cams, springs, retainers or dsmlink? ive been told by doing the cams without an intake manifold i wont get much gain and im better of getting dsmlink cuz ill get more power with a better tune? what are your options? i need advice..... right now i have an safc 2, maf-t, 650 cc, 255 hp fp... someone help me make the right decision...


thanks,

kevin
 
I'd go with DSMLink if you have a laptop already. It's definitely the best thing that I've done. As a single mod it's made the best bang for the buck and I can get my car tuned pretty much exactly the way I want it to run.
Like I said if you have a laptop, go with DSMLink but if you don't go with cams. That's just my thoughts though...or if you don't have a laptop save for one and get Link. Whatever you decide...Good luck :thumb:
 
i have an fp green, tial 44mm wastgate, dnp tubular manifold, full 3" exhaust, 650cc, maf translator, safc 2, 255 hp fp, plugs, wires, intake, hallman boost controller, act 2600 lbs clutch and street disc, greddy fmic full kit and a greddy type s bov
 
Yes, ditch the AFC and get DSMlink. Cams are also a great upgrade for where you are at, but I would choose link over cams if it were me. Proper engine tune is key, and DSMlink has so much more to offer than the AFC.

Also, please update your profile so we can more easily help you.
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top