The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

AWD Auto Center Diff Locker

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

TimIacobucci

10+ Year Contributor
82
5
Jun 21, 2009
Orlando, Florida
I did just post this on an engineering forum looking for suggestions too http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=378095. I have re written it here but I apologize if it sounds like I'm repeating stuff most dsmers already know, I originally wrote it for a general audience.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


This is the w4a33. Currently there is no aftermarket support for the center differential The small spider gears are a weak point on this and the manual version of this transmission. Combined with a lack of responsiveness in the viscous coupling which acts externally to the open differential to limit slip many people simply weld the center differential to create a spool. This works well for drag racing but obviously creates problems for most any other diving situation besides offroad use. So some type of front to rear differentiation is required for any sort of corner turning with any amount of grip.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.
kaiser

This is the kaiser locking differential, not really a differential at all technically but it seems to work pretty well. It is very similar to the wiesmann locker that Carroll Smith praises in his books. Here is a simple video demonstrating it's function.

[link
You must be logged in to view this image or video.

I may add a solid axle and this locker to my car at some point but for now I have a clutch type salisbury in the rear and a modified torsen (wavetrac) in the front. I am trying to apply the priciple sprag locking function of this lsd to the center differential.

In the w4a33 there is a driven gear splined to the case of the center diff housing through which the engine torque is transferred. The other end of the carrier is splined to the viscous coupling. The other side of the viscous coupling is splined to the front output shaft which drives the front differential.


My idea is to weld just the rear output shaft spider gear to the center differential housing and remove the rest of the spider gears. Then to gut the visous coupling and use it's intenal space to house a high strength sprag assembly such as that used in lenco transmissions to connect the center differential housing to the front output shaft.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.
lenco sprag

[link http://www.lencoracing.com/Sprag info.htm]http://www.lencoracing.com/Sprag info.htm[/link]

These are rated for well over 2000 hp in pro mod cars. I am trying to overbuild this part as it will see full output shaft torque AFTER the transmissions gear reduction unlike it's intended use in the Lenco. For a margin of safety if I use 800 ft lbs for engine torque x 2:1 reduction in the torque converter (not sure how accurate that number is) x first gear ratio of 2.846:1 x the reduction to the center diff driven gear at 1.125:1 it works out to just over 5000 ft lbs. That is quite allot of load but the kaiser has been designed to take more torque than this so it can be done, they have a no questions asked warranty if you break their locker.

My thinking is that this system would act as a constant rear wheel drive car that will drive the front wheels when their speed is equal to or (attempting to be) slower than the rear wheels. This should give no understeer on corner entry or tight turns like even a perloaded salisbury center diff would give let alone compared to a welded diff, and fully lock even if the rear wheels have no traction at all. I cannot envision a scenario in which the rear wheels would need to turn faster than the fronts, am I missing anything?

The one problem I do see is there would be no front drive in reverse with a simple one way sprag. Is there any application which uses a high torque two way sprag like has been designed into the kaiser I might be able to retrofit?

Please let me know if you have any suggestions or ideas or see any other potential problems with the idea that I have presented here.
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
I've been researching the details of this again and have come across some interesting information to add.

Two other forum discussions in particular have caught my interest. The first is an FSAE forum discussion about the wiesmann locker,
[link http://www.fsae.com/forums/showthre...wthread.php?6339-Weismann-Differential[/link]

The second is a machinist forum regarding a bidirectional roller clutch, [link http://www.practicalmachinist.com/v...al/bidirectional-roller-clutch-138620/[/link]

Firstly I would like to say I have mischaracterized these lockers, kiaser and wiesmann by describing them as sprags. The sprag is a very specific one way device, these use cam activated two way roller clutches.

[quote Chris Wiesmann]Back to the Locker. It is not a spague device for Pete's sake. (pun intended, my dad's name was Pete!) It is a roller clutch that locks in both directions and freewheels in both directions.[/quote]

This is from the first referenced FSAE discussion, post 36 on page 4 [link http://www.fsae.com/forums/showthre...d.php?6339-Weismann-Differential/page4[/link]

The practical machinist forum references a warn automatic locking hub as just such a bidirectional roller clutch device as it seems I am looking for.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


If I could get my hands on a set of heavier duty auto lockers this could be a very real possibility to look at.

[quote Chris Weismann]We used the Weismann Locker concept but made it only one-way drive for two main reasons. One to allow the front wheels to roll when landing on the front, thereby eliminating the back drive thru the ring gear and pinion and to the transfer case and gearbox, thus saving parts from breakage; and two, to allow the front end to disconnect and act like a Pro-2 truck and rotate quickly.[/quote]

[quote murpia]As an aside, the most successful 4WD Group B rally car, the Peugeot 205 T16 employed a one-way coupling between the centre and front diffs at some point in it's development history.[/quote]

Both from the FSAE forum. Maybe there is a good argument in a center diff application NOT to have a bidirectional function. I need to see if I can find out more about the peugoet but if they already had a similar idea as what I am proposing and implemented it using a one way clutch that is pretty good evidence it works well and that I'm probably on the right path.

The auto hub lockers do see full wheel torque after the front differential gear reduction as well so it may well be far more robust in an application before the front diff. Thought? Opinions? Lenco one way or auto locking hub 2 way?
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top