92GSXBaltimore
20+ Year Contributor
- 331
- 5
- Feb 19, 2003
-
Baltimore,
Maryland
whoops...
, i ment VIII 
, i ment VIII 
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
, i ment VIII 
CanadianTSi said:An S-AFC and 650's can go faster than most people on this board ever will.
Just get the 650's and be done with it.

kgtalon95 said:Very true, my buddy had seimadeka 780's and an afc on his 14b and that car absolutley flew!! Granted his timing advance at WOT was 28![]()
Piggybacking makes a ton of power.......if you know how to use it

daren_p said:Holly, 28 deg at wot, how did he not knock? Low boost or tonns of fuel

Stoner said:My 550's didn't seem to be flowing 550cc's, more like 500cc's and thats why I made the statement about some injectors dont flow what they are advertised at in my original post. If you are talking about my PTE 880's the deadtime is 300 usec with a global at -42 which makes them more like 775's but that is more than enough fuel.
And global setting is the one that determines how much the injectors are flowing not deadtime.
BGGSTin said:Anyways, I have FIC 550's and I'm pulling 15% global and on the rpm map up to an additional 45% by 6000 rpm. I was confused that I needed to pull so much fuel for it to run good, but it does.
BGGSTin said:Yeah but I deadtime affects the global settings, at least when I'm playing with DSM Link it does. Isn't dead time the nano seconds between pulses? I'm not sure.
Anyways, I have FIC 550's and I'm pulling 15% global and on the rpm map up to an additional 45% by 6000 rpm. I was confused that I needed to pull so much fuel for it to run good, but it does.
Boiler2 said:550's should be enough for most people with the EVOIII. I had to bump up my fuel pressure on my 550's with my setup on the EVOIII as I was running out of room. This by the way is another option ... bumping up the fuel pressure if your system can handle it. Can make the 550's more like 580's or 600's. You need an AFPR though which depending on your goals, you may need down the road anyway. With the 190 you are fine though.
rowlex said:What boost are you running and whats your injector duty cycle?
BGGSTin said:I'm going up to 29 psi at points, 21-25 psi all time. I'm not sure of the duty cycle because DSM Link isn't logging any of that right (duty and airflow).
I agree... I run a base fuel pressure on my Fullthrottle AFPR of about 48psi with my RC 550's. I also run a FP ported B28 @ 24psi, HKS cams, walbro 255lph, S-AFC, logger, and a 75 wet shot on pump gas.Boiler2 said:550's should be enough for most people with the EVOIII. I had to bump up my fuel pressure on my 550's with my setup on the EVOIII as I was running out of room. This by the way is another option ... bumping up the fuel pressure if your system can handle it. Can make the 550's more like 580's or 600's. You need an AFPR though which depending on your goals, you may need down the road anyway. With the 190 you are fine though.

rowlex said:ok, thats because your running the gm maft setup. That thing is incredibly mis-calibrated. At some points I am pulling 21% of airflow to get it right.

BGGSTin said:The boost pressure isn't miscalibrated though...That's from an external source, not DSMLink, my duty and airflow is way off though so I need to calibrate that
Maybe I misunderstood. But until the maft is calibrated your airflow and boostest will be off in dsmlink(u know this tho
. Ofcoarse the boost reading from your gauge will be accurate. Have fun calibrating it, it took me a while + numerous pulls. Then when the weather changed it went off again. 

I agree with you, and it depends on how long ago your referring to. Actually more people have busted 11's than you would think on 550's. With awd's of course. I agree knowledge and technology get better with time, and things change over time. I know of a guy that has run 450's deep into the 12's. Not everyone is an ace of a tuner. Tuning is the key. I know I'm making as much power on spray, if not more than some people with 50 trims on pump gas, and I'm using 550's. I'm getting about 18 degrees of timing at redline running 24 psi on a ported FP B28, HKS 264/272 cams, and a 75 wet shot. Although I have bumped up my base fp to about 45 or 46 psi to be a little more safe. Anyways.. I'm not trying to recommend 550's to everyone. I'm just saying that you can take 550's alot farther than most people would think with the proper tuning, and a little ole' thing called a AFPR. Here's the guy I'm referring to. http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/member.php?&do=vehicledetails&userid=12315pickens said:Damn... I can remember way back when people were using 550's with 20g's with no problems.
11-04-2005 08:40 PM
Yea, maybe true. But how many people were running 11's on 16g's then. Knowledge is power..literally. Just because something was done ump-ting years ago doesn't mean its still the best way to do something today.