2G My Eclipse 2G keeps veering to the right and I don't know why.

[mbermendsm]

I have a problem with my late 1996 Eclipse 2G. I replaced the coilovers and all the suspension arms, and the car pulls to the right. I'm from Spain. I've attached the alignment report; maybe you can help me.
FRONT: left
convergence: -00.01º
camber: -01.74º
caster: +02.84
steering knuckle inclination: +09.83º

FRONT: right
convergence: -00.02º
camber :-01.25º
caster: +03.77º
steering knuckle inclination: +07.44º

REAR: left
convergence: +00.64º
camber: -03.11º

REAR: right
convergence: +00.26º
camber :-01.67º

You must be logged in to view this image or video.

 

[luv2rallye]

Alignment basics: With front camber difference (between RF and LF cambers) of 0.5 degree or more, the vehicle will pull to the side with the most positive camber. In your case: -1.25 (RF) is more positive (or less negative) than -1.74 (LF), so it will pull to the right.

Plus you're way out of camber spec anyway. Spec is 0.0 +/- 0.5 (in blue on your sheet).

 

[mbermendsm]

Alignment basics: With front camber difference (between RF and LF cambers) of 0.5 degree or more, the vehicle will pull to the side with the most positive camber. In your case: -1.25 (RF) is more positive (or less negative) than -1.74 (LF), so it will pull to the right.

Plus you're way out of camber spec anyway. Spec is 0.0 +/- 0.5 (in blue on your sheet).

That's true, but since the car is lower than stock, I imagine the camber changes. I don't know if the rear imbalance is also due to a faulty rear control arm or something like that. Everything at the front is new, and I read that in these cars, the caster is more positive on the passenger side than the driver's, since I was told that one wheel is further forward than the other. (I've attached videos so you can see anything.)

You must be logged in to view this image or video.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.

 

[luv2rallye]

"I read that in these cars, the caster is more positive on the passenger side than the driver's, since I was told that one wheel is further forward than the other."

Who told you that? I don't think one wheel is further forward than the other. However on the 97-99's there supposedly is more positive caster on the RF than the LF. This more caster means that the relative heights of the front wheels are mis-adjusted more when you steer.
See posts 1, 4, 7 here: https://www.dsmtuners.com/threads/2g-caster-changing-it.176057/

 

[mbermendsm]

"I read that in these cars, the caster is more positive on the passenger side than the driver's, since I was told that one wheel is further forward than the other."

Who told you that? I don't think one wheel is further forward than the other. However on the 97-99's there supposedly is more positive caster on the RF than the LF. This more caster means that the relative heights of the front wheels are mis-adjusted more when you steer.
See posts 1, 4, 7 here: https://www.dsmtuners.com/threads/2g-caster-changing-it.176057/

I'll take a look at it, but I recall reading about that camber issue; if you look at mine, there's a bigger difference on the passenger side compared to the driver's side, even though the readings fall outside the specs shown on the alignment machine. Still, I want to get an alignment done because I replaced those control arms shortly after the last alignment, and I want to see if anything has improved—aside from the fact that the entire rear suspension is in terrible shape and needs replacing.