Playboy4ll23
15+ Year Contributor
- 54
- 0
- Dec 28, 2004
-
Vancouver,
Washington
apparently...wont that cost like soooo much more!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
hewhoisknot said:if u get in an accident on their policy u mess up their record.... and no ur parents aren't idiots... they r the 2 people that brought u into the world and sacraficed everything they had for u
ArticNemesis said:Exactly, why should they have to pay when you get tickets or get in accidents.. This way they can say, ohwell, guess you are going to slow down or you are going to pay for it..
It's pretty smart, that way it holds you responsible for your actions.
FusionTalon said:i dont know what halik smoked but its gota something good casue it is legal to be on ur parents plan
halik008 said:NOT if the insurance is under his PARENTS name, thus THEM being the OFFICIAL PRIMARY driver, and HIM being the actual PRIMARY driver.......
AS long as YOU are the PRIMARY driver of the vehicle, LEGALLY the policy HAVE to be under yuor name.....
People do this so often.....but it's still illegal....
halik
psychlow said:No, no, no.
Who owns the policy has nothing to do with this. His parents can own the policy all they want and list him as a covered driver and his vehicle as a covered vehicle.
If they state that they will be the principle operator of the vehicle when he actually is, that's against the rules of the policy (and is probably illegal).
If they state that he is the principle operator of his vehicle, it is properly rated.
Who owns the policy is irrelevant, as long as he lives in their household.
halik008 said:In that case it will be no different then the policy being under his name and his parents address.....
The only way he can get the huge break is if the policy states that the parents are the primary driver.......which is illegal and might lead to the insurace carrier dropping his whole family.
If they say he's the primary driver....the amount will not differ any then it being under his name......
halik
PaintMunky468 said:. I sat there while my dad said he was the primary driver, and that I will drive it on occacion.
PaintMunky468 said:Now only about 2 months after I got the car insurred, I crashed it. A new audi cut me off when trying to make an illegal u-turn from the right lane. Now even though I was the secondary driver on the policy, and I was the only one to ever drive the car, insurrense never even mentioned anythng about it. As a matter of fact, I was paid up from insurrense with minimal questioning. I just got my 98' eclipse gs-t and guess wut? I am again the secondary driver, and the accident did not raise the insurrense a large amount ( mostly due to the fact that it wasnt my fault). However, to make this easy, his parents could simply make a deal that if he crashes, he pays them to make up for the raised insurrense.
