The Top DSM Community on the Web

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. Log in to remove most ads.

Please Support JNZ Tuning
Please Support Fuel Injector Clinic

Forza cant mess with this!!!!!!!!!!

This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

eagle4life

15+ Year Contributor
173
0
May 10, 2005
Sylmar, California
Awesome pics. The only thing I could think of is maybe he took the pics of each car individually, then layered all the pics on top of each other so all the individual cars from all the pics would all show up together? hmm :boring:
 
ill be impressed when those are actual "in game" graphics.

not stills that are rendered to look better than actually are. GT4 guys act like taking still pics are the new shit, when SegaGT2002 did it 3 years ago.
 
please, well talk when theyre actual graphics on both systems.

GT3/4 replay graphics are rendered to look that good. you wont see that kind of texturing till PS3/XB360 comes out. until then its just a pretty replay. not that its hard to pull off, since the CPU doesnt have to do all the physics and control calculations that are needed in real time, it can bump up the textures and gfx on the replay.

besides, i want a racing game. not a game that makes purdy replays and pictures. i lost faith in GT after GT2 came out and every car sounded alike. GT3 was named a-spec, im not buying a game with some jdm mad tyteness in it. might as well call it GT V-TEC. 300 different types of mugen hatches and accords, 100 different skylines, 2 mustangs and a vette. im cool off of that.

and talk about living in the past. at least im not repping a game system that was out of date the moment it was created. at least Sony is doing it right this time(with ps3). when GT2002 came out as a launch title it had far better ingame graphics than GT3 which was on its 3rd title at the time, and GT2002 was still a newborn child. sadly, they never did any sequel. same with forza. people compare GT4 to Forza but dont think that GT series have been doing it for almost a decade, and forza is a newborn compared to them, and forza is just as good.

though it doesnt matter. once the new consoles are launched itll even the playing field and well see which software designers are really better.
 
Thomas91169 said:
besides, i want a racing game. not a game that makes purdy replays and pictures. i lost faith in GT after GT2 came out and every car sounded alike. GT3 was named a-spec, im not buying a game with some jdm mad tyteness in it. might as well call it GT V-TEC. 300 different types of mugen hatches and accords, 100 different skylines, 2 mustangs and a vette. im cool off of that.

Well, too bad you got off that bus, cause GT4 does a great job of making each seperate car sound different, even goes far enough to change tones from when it is stock to when an upgraded exhaust or engine upgrade was made. And who cares if there are more than 1 of a given car, thats life... but too bad they are all REAL race cars. I mean, Forza didnt even have an M3 to purchase, just a racing version of it, and im not even sure that its a real racing car.
 
mitsugsx95 said:
sweet pics. How did you get multiple cars in the pic?
I, too, am wondering this..It would see to be a LOT of work to layer them, having to make sure the camera is in the right spot, the settings are the same, and the cars look right.
 
Any more Forza/GT4 arguments go in the other thread.

eagle4life: Please credit the creators of those photos and remove any over 700x700.
 
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community
Boosted Fabrication ECM Tuning ExtremePSI Fuel Injector Clinic Innovation Products Jacks Transmissions JNZ Tuning Kiggly Racing Morrison Fabrications MyMitsubishiStore.com RixRacing RockAuto RTM Racing STM Tuned

Latest posts

Build Thread Updates

Vendor Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top