RipperXX
20+ Year Contributor
- 5,788
- 171
- Feb 23, 2003
-
Royston,
Georgia
So, I might have to replace my clutch setup since it seems the SBR kevlar street disk and the old style ACT pressure plate may not be fully compatible (although I was told otherwise)
So I am considering (once I confirm the current setup is a problem) a new setup, still ACT. Except im thinking maybe go down in pressure plate..pressure and use a "better" as in more friction and grip, clutch disk. Like a sprung 6 puck. Currently the car has the old style ACT 2600 PP with a SBR 3500 kevlar street disk. Oh and a XACT street flywheel.
Or I could just try the "new" style ACT 2600 PP & Street disk, the car gets driven a decent amount on the street, so im not sure if the puck clutch will be an issue. I don't have any experience with them. I'm assuming theres no extra noise with it being a sprung puck clutch disk. Just more grabby. The reason im thinking about reducing the pressure plate pressure, I figure it's just better on the bottom end of the engine, as in reduces the stress on the bearings and what not. Cars currently making a little over 300whp, goal is about 80ish more. I know the 2100/6 puck option is rated to hold 410 ft/lb torque sooo looks like it could do the job fine AND offer less pressure on the bottom end, pedal assembly etc.) Im just worried about how it will behave on engagement etc.
So anyone that has any of these combos, or better yet has had both or all three please comment.
P.S. if you vote, please comment on why you voted the way you did.
So I am considering (once I confirm the current setup is a problem) a new setup, still ACT. Except im thinking maybe go down in pressure plate..pressure and use a "better" as in more friction and grip, clutch disk. Like a sprung 6 puck. Currently the car has the old style ACT 2600 PP with a SBR 3500 kevlar street disk. Oh and a XACT street flywheel.
Or I could just try the "new" style ACT 2600 PP & Street disk, the car gets driven a decent amount on the street, so im not sure if the puck clutch will be an issue. I don't have any experience with them. I'm assuming theres no extra noise with it being a sprung puck clutch disk. Just more grabby. The reason im thinking about reducing the pressure plate pressure, I figure it's just better on the bottom end of the engine, as in reduces the stress on the bearings and what not. Cars currently making a little over 300whp, goal is about 80ish more. I know the 2100/6 puck option is rated to hold 410 ft/lb torque sooo looks like it could do the job fine AND offer less pressure on the bottom end, pedal assembly etc.) Im just worried about how it will behave on engagement etc.
So anyone that has any of these combos, or better yet has had both or all three please comment.
P.S. if you vote, please comment on why you voted the way you did.
Last edited:
. Since theres no springs to pop out, or areas to rub etc. etc. (K.I.S.S) Just wondering if you wish you could do it over with a sprung hub.