1fast97gsx
20+ Year Contributor
- 4,517
- 17
- Jul 6, 2003
-
Orland Park,
Illinois
I'll see how much herz I can get out of mine tonight and smoke all you bishes 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

1fast97gsx said:my measured airflow is 19.5 ... this is on a scm61 @20 psi and 780 injectors tuned roughly at -40. You can't rely on airflow for anything once you have a few mods.
I have DSMLink chip #4. 1fast97gsx said:yea but I have safc. No eprom ecu and no money for dsmlink :thumbdown
nanokpsi said:This is why YOUR airflow is ####ed up. You are logging the amount of airflow the safc lets the ecu see. This is also why an afc sucks. The computer thinks you are flowing less airflow than the other member with a t25 and is giving you those ipw and timing. This is alos whay you are seeing more timing than the 16 you should be seeing if you are flowing more than 2.1 g/rev.
ItsStockOfficer said:I have always liked my afc for the same reason you hate it.
EclipseOwner95 said:is there a " formula " for hz to lb/min ? id really like to see what im pushing through my big 16g, my best " hz " has been right about 2200 stock sidemount on 20psi
RuBiCaNT5X said:3 ways I know of to increase your lbs/min flow... Upgrade intercooler, lean out your a/f some more (if it's running rich) or add more boost...
RuBiCaNT5X said:If you have the GM MAF. you won't read much more than that even though it's flowing more...
kpt4321 said:Wrong again.
The MAFT will give a very accurate airflow rating as long as, once again, you're not using airflow to tune. If you are, then it's the same deal as a SAFC, which has nothing at all to do with the GM MAF.
nanokpsi said:Actually the MAFT is usually inaccurate. People running the DSMlink often have to recalibrate them with seetings in the ecu. The difference is usually liniear though so i would imagine it is something in the conversion process.
Just my experience.SpoolinGSX said:I was running 28.5 lb/min on my t25. And DSMLink was definitely the best mod I ever did.
SpoolinGSX said:I was running 28.5 lb/min on my t25. And DSMLink was definitely the best mod I ever did.