How do these cams compare? Specs inside

[compression]

So years ago i was having my engine built at a shop, talking like '07-'08ish and he apparently had cams custom ground for my car, well looking at the box they seem to be extremely mild..

You must be logged in to view this image or video.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.

How would they compare to some of the other competitors? Should i be looking for a cam upgrade before a turbo upgrade? These specs at first glance look almost stock?...WTF

 

[idkiliketurbos]

Well, they appear to be the comp 101200's which are the same exact cam that Forced Performance sells and labels as their FP2's. I am running them, but I can't give much feedback since I've only had my car running for a total of about 30 minutes. From my research, there are plenty of people running these cams with great results. Do a little searching for the fp2 cams and you will find some threads with some users and their experience with them.

 

[talonalex92]

Just a standard "272" cam ya got there.

 

[delta448]

212 duration at 0.050" is considered a 272 cam to almost everyone... except maybe Kelford, who'd probably call them 259's.

 

[compression]

Ah ok, yea i knew they were comp 101200's just was curious to how they stacked up against competitors.
They have very very little lope, ill post an idle video.
Kelford will be my next cam for sure.

Click picture for video

You must be logged in to view this image or video.