The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

HKS or WEB cams?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

...Semi off topic: I realize everyone's car is different, but isn't 11:1 A/F fairly aggressive on pump gas...you didnt specify. I was thinking more around 10:1 on pump gas, or maybe that's me being conservative....

You bring up a good point, however for pump gas, you would tune closer to the 10.8ish end of the spectrum, while on race gas you would tune towards the 11.1-11.2 area. The reason for this is you still want to be able to run aggressive timing to make horsepower. Again, your point is valid, but 10:1 is a bit on the rich side, even for pump gas.


...Haha, I was going to post about this when I read your above post here, but I guess you beat me to it. What you say makes sense about EGT's and simply retardation of the exhaust cam, but wouldnt your engine worsen if EGT's hit a certain degree even if the AF mixture is correct? I would think there is a point where the temperature is too hot for the aluminum head, and valves to handle, and would begin causing problems. Excuse me if I'm not being exact here it's 3:30, and my roommate downstairs decided to be a dick tonight and be really loud with his drunk ass friends, so I coudlnt sleep and decided to post stuff....

You are correct, and the quality of the parts you use plays a very big role here. This is why things like stainless steel valves become so important for higher HP applicatons and larger turbos that require more heat to spool. You can tune the EGT's to be higher in the exhaust manifold than in the combustion chamber through retarding the exhaust cam or even simply retarding ignition timing; you are going to get SOME explosions in the exhaust manifold but that will be beneficial for turbo spoolup. Those are the kind of EGT's that you want, however can wear down lower quality parts; i.e. it may not be so good for turbine wheel blades or wastegates. This is the reason why some companies will make parts out of inconel (sp.) so they can withstand the high temps sometimes needed to make big power. There is a tradeoff here, and there is definately a learning curve. I can divuldge some tuning secrets (which I do from time to time for those who are paying attention) to give you an idea of what you want in a turbo car. Let's first take a step back to what I mentioned before about cam and ignition timing, and how it affects EGTs and where the explosions occur. With retarding the cam timing, you are going to be reducing valve overlap, and creating a more violent explosion within the combustion chamber (therefore again not forcing cylinder pressure out of an exhaust valve) so in essence, you are going to be increasing combustion chamber temperatures. With retarded IGNITION timing, picture how this works. Mind you that the plug is firing upwards of say 18-20 degrees ATDC so the piston is already on its way down the cylinder, the exhaust valve is already beginning to open, and you are taking this hot mixture of air and fuel, and forcing it to another hot place, and then igniting it just before it gets there. PAY CLOSE ATTENTION HERE. This is exactly what happens in a diesel motor (taking a hot mixture, and bringing it to a hot place; causing it to ignite.) What is going to happen with retarded ignition timing is that you will actually be causing some explosions in the exhaust manifold, causing EGT's in the manifold to potentially be hotter than combustion chamber temps. (keep in mind that combustion chamber temps can vary greatly..they do make temp sensors for the combustion chambers but I'm not sure how accurate they would be on our DOHC motors as they go into the spark plug bung, and the accuracy really depends on how far the plug protrudes into the combustion chamber which on our cars is not very far, etc. but I'm getting off topic here) Here's the part to pay attention to, and the part where I explain another reason why a PMS for instance is SOO much better than an AFC. IF you want to spool a turbo fast, I mean to LIGHT THAT THING UP at low rpms, here is what you do. You want to add fuel, and retard ignition timing so that you DO realize some actual combustion (explosions) in or about the opening of the exhaust manifold. There is a very fine line here. You will come to find it only takes a VERY short period of time, sometimes maybe even only a couple hundred rpm to acheive the desired affect you want, and then you must go back to advancing ignition timing to get proper combustion as of course retarded ignition timing is not ideal for efficient combustion. A sidenote of what's also cool about a PMS is that you can tune the car to do this only under full throttle so that the car is it's normal efficient self under regular driving. See what I wrote about heat energy and you'll understand why this works. Go watch a Pro 5.0 race and watch the turbo cars run. A lot of the time you will hear a loud POP or perhaps a POP POP sound, and then the car will focking RIP off the line. The 'pop' is the sound of combustion in the exhaust manifold (or headers) lighting the turbos up like a focking rocket. I'm sitting here getting goosebumps because of how scientific, and how cool this process is, and how it affects a turbo car and the way it performs. A LOT of people don't know this, and really don't understand what is going on inside the motor, and what's really happening with ignition and cam timing, and how it affects power; they simply think run a bigger turbo to flow more air, and add more fuel, and you make power by proxy. This is not me trying to be a know it all, but these are secrets that a lot of tuners DON'T want to share because that is their competative edge over everyone else. I'm reluctant to share them as well, but I don't know if my financial situation would ever allow me to own my own shop and be successful, so I might as well help you all out for free huh? ;) If I DO open a shop, then you all better come to me to buy parts and get work done...hehe. Anyway, I think this subject may go even further with the additional questions I'm being asked, so I may go a little deeper into it depending on response. I hope this answers all the questions I've had so far.

Regards,
 
Just to get this straight, when you said retard exhaust cam timing, you meant higher CCT (combustion chamber temp) and not EGT right? Because EGT and CCT can vary quite differently. I completely agree with retarding exhaust cam timing increase CCT but actually reduce EGT if ign timing remain the same. Unless if my theory is wrong....

Just to recap, advance intake cam timing (also reduce overlap since it open early mean it close earlier too) and retard exhaust cam timing means have a more complete combustion in the chamber thus more efficient. This should reduce EGT instead.
 
...Just to get this straight, when you said retard exhaust cam timing, you meant higher CCT (combustion chamber temp) and not EGT right? Because EGT and CCT can vary quite differently. I completely agree with retarding exhaust cam timing increase CCT but actually reduce EGT if ign timing remain the same. Unless if my theory is wrong....

Just to recap, advance intake cam timing (also reduce overlap since it open early mean it close earlier too) and retard exhaust cam timing means have a more complete combustion in the chamber thus more efficient. This should reduce EGT instead...

You are completely correct on the first part, however combustion chamber temps can vary greatly, so it won't always reduce EGT's via the same ratio, so just don't make that a rule of thumb. Otherwise, you got it perfect. You'll use MECHANICAL devices (the cams in this case) to reduce valve overlap and gain combustion efficiency, and you'll use electronics and ignition (via your tuning device) to change spool-up characteristics, and raise EGT's where you need them.

Regards,
 
rdrkt,

I have 3 questions for you. I just got my larger turbo G60-1 and decided to have my engine rebuild with je pistons .020 over bore and all the other goodies. Origninally with my 18G and non-built engine I purchased 264/272 HKS's which are in my car.

1) Since I have a bigger turbo now and a built engine should I go 272/272.

2) What would be to noticable difference between the 272 intake and the 264 intake?

and

3) If I went 272/272 would I pass emissions?

Thanks,
 
Originally posted by SOURCE1064
rdrkt,

I have 3 questions for you. I just got my larger turbo G60-1 and decided to have my engine rebuild with je pistons .020 over bore and all the other goodies. Origninally with my 18G and non-built engine I purchased 264/272 HKS's which are in my car.

1) Since I have a bigger turbo now and a built engine should I go 272/272.

2) What would be to noticable difference between the 272 intake and the 264 intake?

and

3) If I went 272/272 would I pass emissions?

Thanks,
I dont want to add OT to a thread so I will email you offline
 
rdrkt,

If you want, go ahead and put a copy of the email on this thread; afterall it was originally about HKS vs. Web cams. I think everyone would benefit from your input, and quite frankly, I kinda want to hear what you have to say.

Regards,
 
First "NOSLASER" very good work on this thread, you have spent alot of time on this and deserve alot of credit.

I to agree that HKS stuff is more than a little pricey. I am sure that everyone remembers back in 91 or 92 when HKS was about the only thing out there for our DSM's, and there will always be people who can't change there ways. It worked for me then it will work for you now they say. I am suprised that we have some people like that here, since I figured that they would still be driving their 48 Ford flatheads. With thinking like that we would not have WEB, AGP, forced preformance, IRC, AEM. Heck you stuck in the dirt type's would most likely buy a PFC-F-CON instead of an EMS because it worked for your grandpappy.

Technology changes anyone want to go back to 16g killers, and mutts. New idea's come about and real preformance gains are found, and those products go to the market. You wont get "rdrkt" to change. In a previous exchange he stated that there was no better camshaft for the 4g63 with a 16g than the stock ones. Yes concider that in 12 years no one could come up with a better cam grind than Mitsubishi did in 1989 for a road car, but we have seen 10, 9 ,8, and 7sec. DSM's in less time. You keep resting on the laurels of other peoples accomplishments, others wish to move forward.

I vote for WEB, Because I have had better luck with them. Yes they wont idle as well, but they will make more power than the HKS 264/272 combo on compairable motors.

WEB cam grinds
dur. lift
Grind int exh int exh
546/547 272 256 .400 .385
452/228 264 274 .415 .390
453/228 276 274 .415 .390

I have the 546/547 grind in my car with a speed density air measurment system (AEM sorry no old VPC here) I have no troubles with idle.

Way to go NOSLASER you have proven that a wiseman does not have to be stuck on yesterday.
 
Fair enough. I don’t have the email in front of me but the general idea is this. On any larger turbo setup 50 trim or larger you could probably realize a healthy gain in trap speed and top end power without a meaningful loss of midrange and idling is a stock like smooth in my car.

I also said that with enough tuning just about anything can pass emissions. I have seen people with a 720cc injectors and a pair of 272s pass emissions with no cat! I would imagine that hardest part would be taking enough fuel out of idle to get the exhaust clean enough. I would imagine that you would try to add a bit of timing to clean things up but that is just a guess. I am fortunate enough not only live in an area that doesn’t require emissions but my best friend is an inspection mechanic so I don’t have to worry about stuff like my wastegate and not having a cat.
 
Originally posted by Big Woo
You wont get "rdrkt" to change. In a previous exchange he stated that there was no better camshaft for the 4g63 with a 16g than the stock ones.
You are putting words in my mouth and being an ass to boot. You can read the thread here I was specifically talking about the street grind in a completely stock car with a 14b. In that case I really do feel that I’m right but you just wont listen to logic or reason.

People like to make fun of others for choosing to use proven products. These same people often end up wasting their money and time doing R&D on products that look great on paper but can quite make that leap to the real world. There is nothing wrong with trying out new things but I would much rather let other people do the R&D for me. Its people that think they know better are the one with a car full of products that was supposed to work and an empty wallet. Dont take things so personal.
 
Dumping Fuel and Retarding timing = Anti Lag = Build boost off the line more so than a stutter box. Your normal person would think there car was about to explode and why does it soudn so awful. Little do they know :)
 
Hey Big Woo, do you have any idea how many people have bought web or even crower cams and ended up switching to HKS's only to go faster? The answer may surprise you. You kind of bashed the VPC as well. I agree it was way overpriced for what it did, but you cannot deny though that many many people have and still go very fast with it. So many people want to jump on the bandwagon of newer and better parts with the intention of being cutting edge. Sometimes cutting edge isnt always the best way to go though. Cutting edge 9 times out of 10 just ends up costing you more in the longrun.

Crower's cams are a great example of cutting edge. Almost all their profiles are actually based on the HKS's. If HKS cams are dated and no longer considered good then why is it these "modern" cams are merely copies? HKS must have done something right, huh.

As far as WEB cams go. Some of their grinds may very well make more power than HKS's. In fact, I used to run 453/228 webs and they did make more peak power than my HKS's. However peak power is not nearly as important as he rest of the power curve. Switching to HKS cams dropped my peak power by about 25hp... and made my car several 10ths quicker in the qarter mile. Boost response improved drastically as well. So are HKS's the best...possibly not, but they sure do work. Usually in a marketplace as large as ours if a superior product comes out it doesnt take too long for word to spread. Web and crower cams have been around for quite a while now.. and no waves have been made in the top dsm ranks. They all still use HKS... is it because everyone is old and stubborn? I can assure you many of the fastest dsmers try out these new products usually long before you even hear about them ;) See even us old and stubborn guys try and stay cutting edge. Trust me we are always looking for an edge. But sometimes that doesnt mean changing to the latest and greatest.

If you want to bash the proven ways and those who follow them thats up to you...
 
Ok I here you guys, my intent was not to bash products, HKS's pricing yes. Yesterday was a bad day and needed to let off a little steam, So I apologize for the cheep shot rdrkt. Products improve over time (anyone want to go back to the computers of 10 years ago). New ideas come out, and with them comes differnt thinking. For example the HKS cams 264/272 are a popular choice for street cars. Small increase in intake duration, larger increase in exhaust duration over stock. The Web street grind 546/547 272 intake duration, and 256 exhaust duration, very differnt theroies don't you think? Yes the HKS cams have been around a while and people have developed engines around their cams, and those methods are tried and true. However it is also true that the same supporting parts, tuning teniques, and methodoloiges will not directly compare to those used for the HKS cams.

I do not think that I bashed the VPC I used one for years and went 11.67 @ 119 on it, but I found that between the VPc and the GCC they did not offer enough range of tuning.

Also cams can be debated forever, and people (as I did above) tend to use the advertized numbers when talking about cams. Since ramp speeds can't be accounted for in this mannor it is difficult to compare meaningful numbers unless we using duration numbers @.020, .050, or 1mm, depending on the cam manufacturer. Also since were are talking about the 4g63 remember that we can adjust lobe seperation as well.

Sorry if I came across a little harsh.
 
However it is also true that the same supporting parts, tuning teniques, and methodoloiges will not directly compare to those used for the HKS cams.


oops should have read "for the WEB cams"
 
Sup Larry? Well you saw my laser at DSM meeting in Ridley Creek. Those lumpy idle came from Web Cam street grind.
 
Both of my Galants have 272s in them. Both cars also use VPC/AFC combos (same AFC, in fact). The maroon car doesn't idle, but that's due to throttle body problems more than cam selection. The white car idles like a champ with the 272s in it, no problems whatsoever. Both cars spool quicker now than they did with 264/272s in them. Here is a good idea of what going from stock to HKS cams will do:

I went to Atco with my white galant daily driver, and ran 12.1 @ 113 on the stock cams. A few weeks later, I put 264/272 cams in it, and with no other changes the car ran 119mph. Anyone who's seen my white car knows that it is HEAVY. If anything that car is heavier than it was when it left the factory. The boost used for both days at Atco was 21psi; the internal gate couldn't hold the valve closed any longer to build more boost.

I had a set of street webs for 400 miles, and sold them, only to find out from the buyer that they had rounded off already. HKS cams may be more than Webs, but I'll never spend a cent on any other cams except HKS.
 
damn Nate, talk about bringing a post back from the dead, I actually ended up buying Crower Stage II cams back then and I still regret it. I sold them and went back to stock cams, now Im going to be running HKS 264/272..
 
Are you using an AFC or a DSMLink? If so, just get 272s. If you want to run just a VPC, then that may be a reason to just get the 264 intake. Just get the best cams the first time. :)
 
Quote
"Just get the best cams the first time."

This at best is only an opnion. Looking back through some of the posts on this thread I see some people that are very happy with their WEB cams, and people that are happy with HKS cams. Don't knock what did not work for you, but works for someone else.

I have two DSM's one with the Web cams street grind 274/256 (if I remember right), and one with the HKS 264/272 combo. I have had no durability trouble with either set. I have also built motors for customers using these and other brands of cam manufactures, and have had no trouble with product quality from any of the DSM aftermarket cam manufactures.

Please remember that it is hard to compare the HKS 264/272 int/ex cams with the Web street grind 274/256 int/ex. Seperate and unique schools of thought, don't you think?
 
Yeah Larry your turbo is large enough to warrant a 272/272 pair. I have a 264 coming out of my car since I bumped from the never used 18G to the 60-1. I wasted $250 not getting the first pair the first time. I'll probably be able to unload it though.
 
Originally posted by beekbuttons
Are you using an AFC or a DSMLink? If so, just get 272s. If you want to run just a VPC, then that may be a reason to just get the 264 intake. Just get the best cams the first time. :)

I went with a 264/272 based off of Wes's suggestion. I can not remember the reasoning behind it to be honest but I trust in his opinion.
 
I have the 272/272 HKS cams on my 2g with a super 20g and I love these cams !!! My best pull was 410hp so far and Im at high altitude !!!!
YES these cams are lumpy sounding for real, but pose no threat to idle on my car. I need to raise my upper rev limiter cuz these cams want to pull best at about 4500rpm all the way to rev limiter big time. I never knew how much of a noticability these cams are, you can really feel the different pull it has now than before.
If you run a 20g or bigger these 272s will really surprise you. Anything smaller I suggest the 264s only.
I dont know anything about WEB cams, nobody here has them on any DSMs in my aera. Ive seen CAT cams and CROWER stage 2 series only. Im the only one with HKSs here and people are wild on the way it idles at any street light, they know your s#*% aint stock and you have serious stuff going on under there...
Good luck with your choice, you know your car better than I do.
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top