The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Cams for a 2.3

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Personally, if the car is going to be a DD, you should really look at a set of 272's. You will have a solid midrange and top end, while keeping a decent idle and having a very streetable vehicle.


As for 1993eclipsegs's question, I would reccomend a GT4294R over a GT42 non-ball bearing anyday. You will see spoolup in the 5K+rpm range with the 4294R on 272's with full boost around 5500-6000rpms and will likely see peak torque around 7000rpms and peak horsepower around 8000-8500rpms. Expect at least 500rpms more for the non-ball bearing version.

If this is a race car only, and you don't care about streetability, then I would go with the 280's. Especially if you are revving the 2.3L above 8400rpms towards 9500-10,000rpms.
I hope that you are using Crower or Groden rods at that point with Mahle or Ross pistons, along with dual valve springs and oversize valves to take advantage of the 280's in a stroker race motor.


Personally, I would keep the 272's in a 2.3L street stroker with a turbo like a GT4088R or a GT4094R and rev it to 8600rpms at the track. The 272's with the 4088R makes an excellent street power curve from 3500-8500rpms, peaking torque between 5000-6000rpms, and peaking horsepower from 5500-8000rpms.
 
or maybe they were very off from the factory and needed to be degreed, but I was extremely disappointed.

Just so we're clear (and this isn't directed towards you in particular eclipsegsx1736), I don't care what everyone says cams aren't simply "drop in" and go items! They should always be degree'd upon installation!!! Had your block or head surfaced or decked? Guess what? Your "drop in" cams are no longer installed correctly! Sure you can just drop them in and they will work... Now they won't be performing to their maximum potential but sure they'll work. Just something to think about.
 
Personally, if the car is going to be a DD, you should really look at a set of 272's. You will have a solid midrange and top end, while keeping a decent idle and having a very streetable vehicle.

Between the 280's and 272's, you like the 272's; do you have an opinion between FP3x's and 272's for a DD 2.3L?

I would imagine the FP3 and 3x's due to their increased ramp rate, but checking another opinion.
 
Between the 280's and 272's, you like the 272's; do you have an opinion between FP3x's and 272's for a DD 2.3L?

I would imagine the FP3 and 3x's due to their increased ramp rate, but checking another opinion.

I was looking at the 3X's when they came out a long time ago, and did like the overall attributes of them for RACING. The requirement of dual valve springs, and having to deal with a "square-lobe" extremely agressive ramping cam was not too interesting to me. It just makes it more into an on-off switch, with a very lopey idle, but probably decent gains over the 272/272's. Likely 20-30+HP in the top end.

Am I trying them? Probably not. Did I want to? Of course! I wanted to toss them in for some dyno time for comparison, and maybe a little street driving, but it is a RACE cam.
 
Hey guys, I finally decided on what cams I wanted and they cam in today..... oh yeah, for 320 shipped!! :thumb:
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top