ItsStockOfficer
20+ Year Contributor
- 983
- 1
- Oct 25, 2002
-
Buenos Aires,
South America
Originally posted by DrBrown
I think it changed the fuel pressure because the ecu leans out the O2 sensors to even the a/f mixture. In turn the ecu forces the FPR vaccum sensor thing to change which allows more fuel to enter the rails. I think thats it in a nuttshell.
I don't think there any way in hell your ecu could possibly affect the amount of boost reaching your fmu. I think this is just one more reason fmu's are ass.
Sean
anyways...if I were you, i wouldn't go any smaller than a .63 stage III or V . i like the 50 trim compressor on paper but great results have been had with 50,54,57,60 so i don't know if it really matters. For a 2.5 with a decent head design and low boost, have you considered the 60-1? I know that most people think its too huge but i think if you look at the comp. map you'll see that at low PR (1.4-1.5) the 60-1 is pretty good. of course then you would be creating a monster and i just reread your posts so maybe that is a tad big for your needs.
. I love the way probes look, and I wont buy a turbocharged car and just upgrade it cause its easy. I love my car and I am not trying to run 10's or anything. A probe is better looking and more aerodynamic than 99% of the newer cars out there. Everyone and their grandma has a dsm so I refuse to be like everyone else just cause its easy to be fast. I will buy a 5.7 Trans Am if the money is right, but thats about!
Thanks for the info though, he is doing pretty well for what turbo he has! Give him props from me. Its always nice to see other peeps getting themselves into stuff like this 