fp3052 for 2.3 stroker ?

[dan2288]

Anyone running this setup ? I think it would be a pretty good street setup. Should spool up pretty quickly and pull all the way to 8000 rpm. The fp3065 is about the same price but it will spool up a little later. Which one would you guys recomend and why ? Thanks

 

[Street Surgeon]

For a stroker I'd highly recommend the 3065, a 3052 setup would be really fun but again, I'd highly recommend the 3065.

 

[dan2288]

Is that what you have ? I checked your mod list and didnt see a turbo listed. If so, how do you like it on a 2.3 ? When do you get full spool by ? Do you think its streetable ?

 

[DarthBulk]

I'm running an FP3052 on a 2.4L G4CS, but currently I am still in the break-in period, so I'm not running much for boost. I will be taking it to AMS as soon as it gets warm out, for dyno tuning. All I can say right now is that it spools quite early, but until I get a dyno log I can't put numbers to it.

 

[dan2288]

yea, keep us updated. Anyone else run either one of those turbos?

 

[tsi20gawd]

3065 2.3l spools quick good power. Johnnytsi rocks a 3052 2.3l. Seems to work just fine 11.16 for him. I moved to a gt42r just wating on my manifold and such.
Bryan

 

[daren_p]

What exactly are you looking for, super quick spool or max power? While both will net you very nice numbers on both pump & race gas you have to descide your main goal. The 3052 on a stroker would spool very quick & would be very fun in a DD. Based on how a 3065 spools on a stroker I would say the 3052 is basically going to spool for you like an evoIII would on a stock comp 2.0L. Obviously spool can vary a good amount from setup to setup but I would ball park the 3052 at 3500 while the 3065 at 4000 rpms. I wouldn't consider a 3065 a laggy turbo on a stroker. If I had awd with a built stroker, this would be the route I would go even on a daily driven car. I have a stock 2L & am also fwd so I went with the 3052.

 

[TrboANTsi]

for a stroker id say 3065. i wish i got that instead of the 52 i purchased because now im thinking about a 2.4 setup also. Even thought the 52 is a great turbo..65 sounds like soo much more room to grow..and for the main idea that i think bigger is better

 

[unlmtdndeavor]

i have a 2.0 with a 3052. in a few weeks i am moving up to a fully built 2.0 and am sticking with the 3052. i personally think the 3065 will be perfect for the 2.3. in all honesty, i would go with a 35r for a stroker, as you can easily max out the 3065. so i will be the first to suggest a 3575.

then again, it all depends on your goals. for my immediate setup: built 2.0, 8.5cr, ported 1g head with crower valve springs and retainers, fp2 cams, and stock intake mani... i am looking for about 420awhp on 91+meth, thats on a mustang dyno, factor in about 15% for a standard unloaded dynojet..and you're near 480awhp. and thats with the 3052 easily. if you want more, i suggest the 3575, you won't suffer much lag, only about as much as a 30r on stock 2.0 if not less, depends on the tune. just my .05

 

[dan2288]

yea, I just dont want to make the mistake of going too small at first and then wanting a bigger turbo. I think I will go with the fp3065. Should be a pretty good street setup.

 

[hahnsuper16g]

I went with the 3052 with a fully built motor tranny upgrades and fully built suspension setup I am also on a fwd and i am about to start my breakin this week if the motor was stroked i'd def go with the 3065 or bigger.